An exploratory study of the perception of co-creation experience in the tourism industry: A case study in Danang city, Vietnam

Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
International Conference on Marketing in the Connected Age (MICA-2018), October 6th, 2018  
Danang City, Vietnam  
An Exploratory Study of the Perception of Co-creation  
Experience in the Tourism Industry: A Case Study in Danang  
City, Vietnam  
Pham Thi Lan Huonga*, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinha  
aFaculty of Marketing, University of Economics, The University of Danang, Vietnam  
A B S T R A C T  
This study examines the perception of co-creation tourism experience from a tourism expert perspective in  
Danang city. Reviewing literature and applying in-depth interview with tourism experts who hold the  
management level in tourism organization of both government and business level are used to explore the  
perception of current tourism co-creation experience and the evaluation of the potential for development of  
co-creation tourism in the city. Findings suggest that tourism managements had perceived the co-creation  
tourism experience, however; the city’s investigation into the development of co-creation products is still  
spontaneous and straightforward. The potential tourism products of the city developed from the advantage of  
natural resources such as sea, river, and mountain, which currently stressed on sea tourism only. Natural  
resources and location of Danang create the most robust capacity to develop co-creation tourism experiences.  
The results also reveal the lack in both development strategy and management from tourism destination  
management to co-creation tourism experiences of Danang city. The study also provides some future  
suggestion for Danang city tourism management.  
Keywords: co-creation; tourism experience; exploratory research; Danang city; perception  
1. Introduction  
Recent studies on tourism experiences stress the role of tourists as co-creators of their own experience  
(Prebensen, Vittersø, & Dahl, 2013) and that tourism organizations and destinations need to deliver memorable  
experiences (Neuhofer, Buhalis, & Ladkin, 2013). These trends are leading businesses (Ramaswamy & Gouillart,  
2010) and destinations (Prebensen & Foss, 2011) to involve customers in the design, production, and  
consumption of experiences. Experiences are considered desirable due to their contribution to the meaning of  
individuals' lives (Pine, Pine, & Gilmore, 1999) as they connect the affective, cognitive, and behavioral  
dimensions on a moment-to-moment basis (Scott, Laws, & Boksberger, 2009).  
The idea of co-creation experience tourism requires the corporation between the service provider and receiver  
to delivery a co-creation tourism products however it is not easy to build a system supporting for this. Business  
and destination management should understand the meaning and benefits of co-creation experience in tourism  
strategy in both company and country level. Danang city is well-known as tourism city of Vietnam thus the city  
is expected to create a healthy tourism industry that concentrates on co-creation tourism experience. However, to  
achieve this goal, the city's business and management in tourism should perceive and understand about current  
* Corresponding author. E-mail address: phamthilanhuong@due.edu.vn  
272  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
and potential tourism of Danang before thinking about how to develop. Thus, we raise a question on how does  
tourist organization/destination business and management in Danang city recognize the co-creation tourism  
products, and their evaluation of current co-creation tourism experience in the city?  
This study aims to investigate the perception and evaluation of tourism practices creating co-creation  
experiences of Danang city. The study begins with the brief of literature related with co-creation experience in  
tourism. The research method was discussed and the findings were provided later. Conclusions and implications  
also were reported in this paper.  
2. Literature Review  
Tourism co-creation experience  
The theoretical and empirical studies of co-creation in the context of tourism have increasingly examined in  
recent years. The previous studies in the tourism literature concentrated to co-creation in both theoretical (Scott  
et al., 2009) and applied perspective (Bertella, 2014; Mathisen, 2013). The scope varies from specific tourism  
experiences contexts (Bertella, 2014) to wide industry or destinations analyses (Eraqi, 2010). Co-creation in  
tourism studies has been used to explain the changes in tourism supply chain (Räikkönen & Honkanen, 2013),  
analyses destination experience (Zouni & Kouremenos, 2008), customer satisfaction with destination, memorable  
tourism experiences and new approaches to marketing (Lichrou, O'Malley, & Patterson, 2008).  
Co-creation theory (Prahalad & Ramaswamy, 2004) emphasized the active role of customers in creating co-  
creation experience. Notably, the consumer is an active participant rather than a passive recipient (Morgan,  
2006). In the tourism context, the visitor play as a co-creator of the experience in a creative space (Morgan,  
2007). The experiences were created through the interaction between visitors, organizers, performers, and local  
businesses. Tourism co-creation was defined as a relationship between producer and consumer (Azevedo, 2009,  
p. 6), or the contribution of consumers in the design of the experience in order to create value for themselves  
(Haahti, 2006, p. 11). Developing from experience economy literature, co-creation of experience by visitors  
came from the co-production, personalization, and engagement with tourism destination or providers  
(2018) proposed the definition of co-creation tourism experience: “a co-creation tourism experience is the sum of  
the psychological events a tourist goes through when contributing actively through physical and/or mental  
participation in activities and interacting with other subjects in the experience environment.” Campos’s definition  
draws a relationship between tourist participation, interaction and interaction to create overall tourism  
experiences. Campos et al. (2018) suggested the effect of experiencescape (e.g., physical, social and  
organizational) on co-creation tourism experiences can lead to creating experience memorability of tourist. Thus,  
co-creation is not just come from the tourist side only; it has been the corporation between tourist provider,  
consumer, and the most important is tourism environment that can build from both tourist organization and  
destination management.  
Previous studies in tourism co-creation can divide into two main perspectives. The first is tourism supplier  
perspective that includes tourism business organization and destinations. In tourism destination and organization  
points of view, they share the vision of co-creation as a business orientation and strategy towards  
competitiveness to be dealt with management and marketing principles and thinking (Campos et al., 2018). In  
both, the concern includes mechanisms, processes, and systems of engaging tourists in co-creation (Ciasullo &  
Carrubbo, 2011; Jauhari & Bharwani, 2017) so that they can live a memorable consumption experience (Jauhari  
& Bharwani, 2017). With this thinking, co-creation can be thought of as occurring before, during and after the  
travel (Neuhofer et al., 2013) and its affected by the mobilization of all organization’s or destination’s networks  
and processes to encourage tourist participation and interaction to generate the total value and well-being  
(Ciasullo & Carrubbo, 2011; Eraqi, 2010). However, tourists need to uses their resources (i.e., knowledge, time,  
and creativity) in contextual, personalized, and interactive experiences to gain value of co-creation.  
As a business orientation, co-creation involves willing to participate in the design, production, and  
consumption of experience with tourism provider (Eraqi, 2010; Zouni & Kouremenos, 2008) or to collaborate  
with the tourism provide in creating new products or services (Santos-Vij & Rodriguez, 2013). To apply the co-  
creation tourism mindset, the management operation is required changes to management and staff behaviors and  
competencies (Haahti, 2006; Lugosi & Walls, 2013). For example, the frontline staff is essential to facilitate co-  
creation activities due to their interaction with the customer. However, internal marketing activities are needed to  
help foster their willing to co-creation and build a co-creation culture in the company that encourages their  
participation in service design and improvement (Santos-Vij & Rodriguez, 2013).  
The second perspective is the consumer or tourist perspective. In the relationship between producers (tourism  
organization and destination) and consumers (tourists), consumers are described as co-creators of value (Li &  
273  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
Petrick, 2008) through their engage in design, produce, and consume the products or services (Zouni &  
Kouremenos, 2008) in their consumption experiences. In another word, the tourist perspective analyses the co-  
creation in tourist sphere, encompassing the psychology and behavior involved in experiences, before, during and  
after the travel (Campos et al., 2018).  
3. Research Method  
Research setting  
This research was conducted at Danang city, a tourism city in the middle of Vietnam; the city was given the  
title “the best city for living” in Vietnam. Danang city was known as an attractive destination for both  
international and domestic tourists in the country, with famous and beautiful beaches, abundant natural resource  
(i.e., river, mountain, sea), well-developed tourism infrastructure, and stable social and political environment  
(Wang, Tran, & Tran, 2017). Danang has developed a diversity of tourism products including sea tourism, river  
tourism, cultural tourism, ecotourism, business tourism, and travel to visit relatives. Moreover, Danang provides  
different types of services with various products with the aim of meeting the diverse needs of tourists, such as  
excursion services, food service, accommodation services, shopping service, and services for leisure and  
entertainment. In addition to that, after successful host for APEC 2017, Danang rise as a right place for MICE  
tourism in Vietnam.  
Data collection  
Qualitative interviews are a data collection tool adequate to qualitative research design (Finn, Walton, &  
Elliott-White, 2000; Jennings, 2005). This method is based on the assumption that human subjects (respondents)  
can account for their own experience and meanings, shape situations and events, and are not mere passive  
respondents to external stimuli (Finn et al., 2000).  
Qualitative interviews are considered suitable for developing knowledge, understanding, and learning because  
they use an exploratory approach to find the phenomena (Jennings, 2005). The information gained from the  
interview process of respondents is valuable information for the development of a subsequent quantitative data  
collection instrument (Dong & Siu, 2013).  
In this study, the primary data were obtained from semi-structured questionnaire through in-depth interviews  
conducted to how tourism experts (the person who hold the management position in tourism-related  
organizations and companies) expressed and reflected their thinking, perceptions, and thoughts about the co-  
creation tourism experiences in the tourism strategy of Danang city.  
The sampling procedure adopted the snowball sampling method, which is relevant to the research objectives  
or who is expertise about the research topic (Jennings, 2005; Ritchie, Lewis, Nicholls, & Ormston, 2013). With  
the snowball sampling, the previous respondents were asked to introduce another one that they think suitable for  
the research topic. Because this research targeted the experts, who have extensive knowledge and experience in  
running the tourism business or state management.  
In this case, there are ten respondents involving in this research reflect the diversity in many aspects of  
tourism (e.g., travel agent, hospitality, restaurants, state and non-state management level, and professional  
association). Respondents were chosen to represent a mix of gender, age, and working areas. As seen in Table 1,  
respondents were approximately equal numbers of male and female (six male and four female) and from 31 to 63  
years old who has a management position. Name of respondents was changed to the Latin alphabet for a private  
purpose.  
The interview was conducted between December 10 and December 20, 2017 (Raining Season) at  
respondents’ office. This time is suitable for an interview with the managers of the tourism companies due to the  
lower visiting rate period; the respondents have more time to spend on the interview process.  
Respondents’ profile  
Table 1. The respondent information  
Respondents  
Gender  
Age  
Genre  
Travel Agency, Hospitality,  
Restaurant  
Position  
Vice President  
A
Male  
51  
Travel Agency, Hospitality,  
Restaurant  
Hospitality (five-star beach  
resort)  
B
C
Male  
Male  
41  
64  
Vice President  
CEO  
274  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
Hospitality (three-star hotel in  
the central city)  
Destination Management  
(state level)  
D
E
Male  
61  
44  
CEO  
Female  
Vice President  
Tourism Association,  
Destination Management  
(non-state level)  
F
Male  
59  
Chair  
Destination Management  
(state level)  
Destination Management  
(state level)  
G
H
Female  
Female  
35  
35  
Department Head  
Vice Director  
Hospitality (five-star hotel in  
the central city), Tourism  
Association  
Tourism, Training, Tourism  
Association  
I
Female  
Male  
51  
45  
CEO  
CEO  
J
Interview process  
The interviewing process followed the Jennings (2005) guidelines to qualitative interviewing. Preparation for  
the interviews involved several procedures and decisions. Firstly, the researchers directly contacted respondents  
and arranged the time for the meeting. Secondly, the researchers informed about the purpose of the study and  
asked for recording all the discussion before the interviewing process begin. During the interviews, researchers  
applied active, interpretive, and process listening, as recommended by Jennings (2005). All the interviewing was  
recorded, all communication materials were composed of transcriptions of oral communication, and some notes  
were taken regarding paralinguistic communication captured during recording (voice pitch, volume, pauses,  
laughter). The duration of the conversations, ranging from 45 to 80 minutes, depending on the responses from  
the participants, was found sufficient to allow all relevant information to emerge and achieve data saturation.  
Interviews were in Vietnamese, and the main questions were showed in table 2.  
Table 2. Themes, Questions, and Focus used in the interviews  
Theme  
Questions  
Focus  
- understanding of  
respondents about co-  
creation in tourism  
experiences  
- list current tourism  
products in Danang city  
that contains co-creation  
experiences  
How does tourist organization/destination recognize  
the co-creation tourism products?  
(1)What is the tourism products of Danang city? Which  
one is the most interesting and attracting with a tourist?  
(2)How do you understand bout tourist experiences?  
Give some example of the experiences that tourist can  
get in Danang city. (3)Which one are memorable  
experiences?  
Perception about  
current co-creation  
tourism experience  
(4) Do Danang have co-creation tourism products? Do it  
create memorable experiences?  
(5) What are programs or products in both state level  
and company level allowing tourist to engage with  
tourism providers to develop memorable experiences in  
co-creation value chain?  
Evaluation of Danang city  
tourism products that  
concentrated on building  
co-creation experiences  
How you evaluate the current tourism products of  
Danang city creating co-creation experiences?  
(1) Which experiences you think is the most memorable  
with tourist in Danang?  
Evaluating the  
potential of co-  
creation tourism  
experience  
Which products in your company create a co-creation  
tourism experiences (for business respondents)  
(2) Which actions or strategies you create to promote the  
co-creation tourism experiences for Danang city? (for  
authority respondents)  
(3) Do you think the government care and support local  
275  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
business to provide the co-creation tourism products for  
tourist in Danang city?  
(4) What is a government strategy to promote the  
development of co-creation tourism in tourist providers  
in Danang city?  
3. Findings and discussions  
In this section, the results confirmed the questions that stated at the beginning of the study. The perception of  
strong tourism products of Danang city concentrating in co-creation experience showed the majority supporting  
for sea and the combination of sea, mountain, and river in eco-tourism. The advantage and drawback of each  
tourism products were revealed via analyzing the respondents’ data.  
3.1. Perception about tourism practices that is potential to develop co-creation experience in Danang city  
Researchers scan more than 50 pages of text data to count the keywords and build the central themes of the  
results. There are five central themes were revealed, and the findings were presented follow these themes.  
Table 3. Summary keywords related to tourism product in Danang city  
Themes  
Keywords  
Sea and related to the sea (e.g., sand, seafood, beach)  
Leisure  
Sea sport activities  
Diving  
Seacoast  
The combination of sea, mountain, a river in ecotourism  
Seafood  
River  
Mountain  
Near Hue and Hoi An  
Good transportation  
Well infrastructure  
Diversity tourism places  
Value  
Local culture  
Heritage  
History/ historical monument  
Pagoda/church  
Great location for tourism experience  
Cultural and spiritual tourism  
Living style  
Cham/ Cham culture  
Museum  
High-quality infrastructure  
Good service quality  
Han River  
MICE tourism  
River tourism  
Co-Co river  
Waterway transportation  
The combination of sea, mountain, river in ecotourism - current the most developed product  
As a tourism and hospitality city, Danang has potential to develop ecotourism because the advantaged of  
natural condition that includes sea, mountain, and river in the city. Currently, the city investigates more in sea  
tourism. However, the river and mountain also show their potential.  
According to the data analysis, all respondents mentioned the sea as a most robust tourism product of Da  
Nang city, with the word “sea” repeatedly appears in text data. G (female, 35 years, destination management)  
mentioned sea as the strength of Danang tourism  
“... on marine tourism products can be said is not only characteristic of Da Nang tourism. However, tourism  
products related to sea receive large investment from local businesses. I think Da Nang has a beautiful sea,  
276  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
compared with other places. I think the sea is a unique product and attractive to visitors when coming to Da  
Nang.”  
Continuing with this line, other respondents also expressed their support about considering “sea” as the most  
potent product of Danang tourism industry.  
I (female, 51 years old, CEO of the five-star hotel) also expressed her opinion that “Especially we have the  
sea. Everyone that talks to Danang are like going to the sea only. However, to stand on the concept of her, to save  
the guests back to the only sea, the people come and return so many times because they like the sea. They come  
back not because Ba Na, they turn Not because of delicious food or not because of Ba Na Hill or Linh Ung  
Pagoda or something else that just because of the only sea.”  
In our data, the other products that develop base on “sea” were mentioned. The respondents also highlight that  
the ecosystem related to the sea is also an important point of Danang tourism. J (male, 45 years old, CEO of  
travel agency) addressed “the most prominent of Danang’s sea is the marine ecology and infrastructure relating  
with beach, i.e., coast, beach resort. Also, C (male, 64 years old, CEO of five-star beach resort) said that “the sea  
of Da Nang has a particular attraction regarding peaceful, beautiful beach, great sand, clean, more specifically  
management marine environment of the Da Nang government. A (male, 51 years old, Vice President of travel  
agency) thinks it will be a mistake if we do not count seafood as a feature tourism advantage of Danang  
comparing with other destinations. With the natural advantage and the developed fisheries, Danang city has  
potential to build tourism products based on the “gift from the sea” (D, male, 61 years old, central-city hotel  
CEO).  
Beside beach, some respondents addressed the most durable products of Danang tourism is the combination of  
diversity products related with leisure, activities, visiting, food and festival (B, 41 years old, Vice-President  
Tourism agency). This diversity came from the “great position” of Danang that located in the middle of Vietnam  
World Heritage and had an international airport. He also added, “the tourist highly recognize Danang city is the  
unique combination of sea, mountain, and river, all perfectly natural condition combine in one place, that maker  
this city is unique.” After the interviewing analyze, the data showed that the majority of respondents considered  
“sea” as the primary product of Danang tourism. Also, another products and activities related to the sea also an  
advance (i.e., sea leisure, festivals, beach resorts, and so on). Due to the unique natural resources containing sea,  
river, and mountain in one place, Danang has the advantage to combine these resources to develop diversified  
tourism products. This the main reason allowing the city creates multiple tourism products, such as leisure,  
discovering nature, experiencing the culture, playing activities and so on.  
Great location for tourism experience  
As a transportation hub for central Vietnam, DaNang located near several UNESCO World Heritage Sites,  
including the Imperial City of Hue, the Old Town of Hoi An, and the My Son (former Champa kingdom capital  
and religious central) ruins much of its tourist activity. Tourist come to Danang not only want to visit this city but  
also want to visit other tourism places then this city becomes a center of “The Road of Heritage Sites in Central  
Vietnam.” The road links World Heritage Sites in the Middle of Vietnam, namely: Phong Nha-Ke Bang National  
Park (Quang Binh province), the ancient capital of Hue, ancient trade port city (old town) of Hoi An (Quang  
Nam province) and My Son Champa ancient capital.  
Cultural and spiritual tourism  
Receiving the benefit from its location, Danang city also contains the diversity and fascinating culture. C  
(male, 64 years old, five-star beach resort) emphasized that “… Besides the value of natural resources, Danang is  
the place of two rich cultural flows. The first flow came from the North affecting Chinese culture, and the West  
flow contained an Indian cultural value. Danang city naturally has Champa cultural that dominated the central of  
Vietnam in the past. Danang has a mixed and diversified culture that can be good for attracting tourists who want  
to find about culture and local history”. In addition to that in the North of the city has Katu people – a minority  
community of local ethnic people with specific cultural and living condition can be great for developing the  
combination between cultural and natural discovery (B, 41 years old, Vice-President Tourism agency). It is  
noticed that Danang city is a small city but a center for transportation, that why tourist usually came to Danang  
before going to other tourist places. J (male, 45 years old, tourism agency) argued that the tourist might not  
recognize the difference in borderline among tourism sides in several cities in the middle of Vietnam near  
Danang.  
River tourism  
Danang’s river systems are potential to become tourism products. The most famous river in Danang is Han  
River located in the central of the city. The river divided the city into two parts that create the advantaged in  
developing a landscape both side of the river. It is noticed that one of the characteristics of Danang city is “the  
city of bridges” because of the original of these bridge’s architectures. For example, the Dragon Bridge attracted  
many visitors come to see and enjoy the ejection of fire and water from the dragon’s head - the unique activity of  
277  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
this bridge in the weekend. The river is also a host and stage for the performances in International Firework  
Festival celebrated every year.  
J (male, 41, CEO of tourism agency) thought the city is still lack in the number of tourism activates on the  
river. He suggested that the authority need to allow more develop tourism activates instead of just allowing some  
floating restaurant and tourism boat are exploiting the river. In addition to, the walking stress along two sides of  
the river demanded more activities to gain the attraction from tourists (G, female, 35 years old, state management  
for tourism).  
MICE tourism  
“Danang was chosen to host APEC 2017 is the strongest evidence to confirm for the MICE tourism of the  
city” said by G (female, 35 years old, state management). Danang has many five-star hotel and resort that can  
offer extensive accommodation including indoor and outdoor venues with world-class service. For example, the  
infrastructure was built to serve for an APEC meeting will be used to developing MICE tourism in the city. J  
(male, 41, CEO of tourism agency) believed that Danang city has enough condition to host world-class level  
meeting or conference. The success of the celebration of APEC proved the capacity and the forte to host events  
and festivals. The evidence is the city was named as the city of exhibitions and events in Travel World Magazine  
in both 2015 and 2016 (C, male, 64 years old, CEO five-star beach resort). In addition to, with the good position  
that is near other tourist attractions, Danang can develop MICE and connect with other types of tourism to  
support for the diversity of the city tourism products.  
3.2. Evaluation tourism products creating co-creation experiences in Danang city  
The majority of respondents knows and understand about co-creation tourism creating experiences that require  
the participation of tourists in the service delivery process. The respondents showed their perception of co-  
creation tourism products in Danang city. J (male, 45, CEO tourism agency) said “… we have a beautiful beach  
and a fisherman village; we can develop a co-creation tourism, I guess, for example, tourist can go to the sea in  
basket or ship with fisherman, try to use fishing-net…” Also, tourist can learn how to make a dish with seafood  
and local vegetables. E (female, 44 years old, destination management) mentioned about some events celebrating  
recent years, namely International Marathon completion, Triathlon (Ironman 70), Asia Golf tourism convention  
2017 that attracted the tourist to participate and gain experiences. In the business level, several co-creation  
experience activations like mountaineering in Marable Mountain, tracking Bach Ma National Park and Son Tra  
Mountain received the positive signs in tourism development. C (male, 64 years old, five-star beach resort) gave  
an example of how his company creates a memorable tourism experience through co-creation activities of tourist.  
He proved in this resort has a garden that tourist can grow their tree or plant and give the name for it. This plant  
is the local or protected pants in Vietnam that were encouraged to cultivate for protection and environment. He  
optimized that guested like this activity and will return in the future to watch their plant growing.  
However, the respondents agreed that the development of co-creation tourism products in Danang city is  
spontaneous, occasional, small, undiversified and disconnected. Although several co-creation tourism already  
had in the city, it is just an effort of an individual business or single activities from the destination management. J  
(male, 41, CEO of tourism agency) thought in the city level (destination management) co-creation tourisms  
happened in significant events (e.g., color me run, international marathon or street musical festival), thus they are  
not able to celebrate more or in another activity, then it leads to the interrupt in co-creation tourism activities of  
the city. The respondents showed their concern about the big event might attract the massive people at the time,  
however, do not keep they visit at other time of the year. In the business level, co-creation may occasionally  
happen in a big organization (e.g., five-star resort/hotel) for their guest only, activities that encourage the  
engagement of community is not favorite in Danang tourism product (Chi, female, 51 years old, CEO of the five-  
star hotel).  
About the size and frequency of co-creation tourism activities, the respondents also mentioned that the co-  
creation tourism products of Danang city are small and simple in both ideas and size, comparing with Hoi An  
[the old town - the most tourist attraction place in middle of Vietnam], We [Danang] still have a far distance  
(Lan, female, 35 years old, state tourism management). The tourism activities without the support and  
management of authority will be spontaneous and less professional. Agreeing with the destination management  
organization (DMO) need to take a role to establish, support and manage the development of co-creation tourism  
activities. J (male, 41, CEO of tourism agency) believed that DMO might know the form of co-creation however,  
not recognize its essential role in creating a co-creation tourism products entirely. He added, “DMO need to have  
real research about co-creation tourism and provide a strategy, policy and a professional team to lead this  
transformation.” The co-creation tourism required the change in the mindset of tourism management about the  
role of customers in the service delivery process, the role of the business organization in running the service and  
the role of DMO in managed and supported the co-creation tourism delivery.  
278  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
The final drawback of co-creation tourism in Danang city was mentioned in the data is about the lack of  
community orientation of co-creation tourism products. The co-creation tourism is not just tourist viewing the  
history and culture in the beautiful museum (e.g., Champa Museum), it requires the real experiences that gain  
from engagement with the life, activities of local culture. C (male, 64 years old, five-star beach resort) suggested  
that the city authority not be only investigated to build a beautiful museum, hotel, resort, the tourist do not just  
look at these things, they look the aboriginal of sea, the peaceful and skilled of fisherman in Tho Quang fishing  
village, making a personal handicraft from baked clay in Hon Lan, etc.  
4. Conclusions and implications  
This study has contributed to the research and practice of tourism by studying perception and evaluation of co-  
creation tourism experience of Danang city. The results were achieved by conducting a literature review of the  
relevant theories and researches related to co-creation tourism and customer experience. Based on this, several  
tourism products was revealed as strong and potential to develop co-creation tourism including sea, mountain,  
and river tourism play as main areas. The evaluation of co-creation tourism practice in Danang reveals that this  
type is still new and in the beginning stage of the development cycle. The development of co-creation tourism  
requires the changing in the thinking of both destination management organization and tourism business.  
Table 4. Evaluation of current co-creation tourism experiences in Danang city and future suggestions  
Some example of Co-creation experience  
tourism products  
Current evaluation  
Some suggestions in the  
future  
Sea tourism  
Activities on the beach and under the sea,  
such as diving, rowing, water-skiing,  
sailing, fishing, canoeing  
Already had, however, happen Need to update to daily  
occasionally in small size  
activities and give for business  
to invest and run  
Mountain tourism  
Tracking in Bach Ma National Park or Son  
Tra Mountain  
Individual and freelance  
hosted a tour only  
Authority should have a  
guideline for this types of  
activities.  
Mountaineering in Marble Mountain  
Recent years, attract tourists  
and local people, however,  
marketing activities and the  
size still small  
Need to promote and connect  
with visiting Marable Mountain  
in a tour.  
Camping in mountains  
Wildlife viewing tourism (e.g., restricted  
animals like birds, )  
Don’t have in tourism area  
and activities are personal  
without management  
Potentially and need to invest in  
infrastructure to support a group  
of tourist, diversity activities  
connect with protecting the  
environment  
River tourism  
Riverboat tour only in a part of Han River  
(e.g., viewing the landscape, eating on the  
boat)  
Fewer activities on the boat,  
simple viewing tour, less  
attractive with tourists  
Develop river tourism that uses  
the boat as main transportation  
method to tourism places. For  
example:  
Connecting with another river in the system, Not yet develop  
using the boat as transportation and develop  
the tourist places along both sides of the  
+ Han-Co Co River tour visiting  
local handicraft villages,  
Marable Mountain, “Quan The  
Am” pagoda, K20 cultural  
village  
+ Cu De – Truong Dinh River  
tour visiting Nam O culture  
area: Historical well, fish sauce  
river. The historical places, traditional  
handicraft villages, local food villages and  
another tourism place near the river can be  
connected to develop new ways of visiting.  
279  
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
village, Temple of Lady Bo Bo,  
Tomb ò Tien Hien  
+ Han – Tuy Loan River tour  
visiting Cam Ne Sedge village,  
Tuy Loan Temple  
For tourism practices, our study offers some suggestions for local tourism provider; Table 4 showed some  
examples of areas that the respondents and researchers suggested the development of co-creation tourism  
experience products. There are some limitations associated with this study. The qualitative interview has its  
limitations. The interpretation depends considerably on a researcher’s skills and background. Therefore, there is  
no one truth or right result. Another limitation is that the study was conducted by researching only tourist experts  
who keep a management position in tourism organization both business level and authority level. As it was  
mentioned in the literature review, the tourist perspective of co-creation tourism should be studied in order to  
confirm that the perception and evaluation about co-creation tourism experiences in Danang city are the same  
with expert’s perspective. It would be a benefit for local tourism in making the strategy that meets the  
expectation from all dimensions. Future research may use a quantitative method to re-examine in the large  
sample to confirm this study’s results.  
References  
[1] Azevedo, A. (2009). Designing unique and memorable experiences: co-creation and the surprise  
factor. Paper presented at the Proceedings of X Congresso Internacional de Turismo de Leiria e Oeste,  
Leiria, Portugal.  
[2] Bertella, G. (2014). The co-creation of animal-based tourism experience. Tourism Recreation Research,  
39(1), 115-125.  
[3] Campos, A. C., Mendes, J., Valle, P. O. d., & Scott, N. (2018). Co-creation of tourist experiences: A  
literature review. Current Issues in Tourism, 21(4), 369-400. doi:10.1080/13683500.2015.1081158  
[4] Ciasullo, M. V., & Carrubbo, L. (2011). Tourist systems co-creation exchanges: Service research and  
system thinking insights for destination competitiveness. In F. P. E. Gummesson & C. Mele (Eds.),  
System theory and service science: Integrating three perspectives in a new service agenda (pp. 1–29).  
[5] Dong, P., & Siu, N. Y.-M. (2013). Servicescape elements, customer predispositions and service  
experience: The case of theme park visitors. Tourism Management, 36, 541-551.  
doi:10.1016/j.tourman.2012.09.004  
[6] Eraqi, M. I. (2010). Co-creation and the new marketing mix as an innovative approach for enhancing  
tourism industry competitiveness in Egypt. International Journal of Services and Operations  
Management, 8(1), 76-91. doi:10.1504/IJSOM.2011.037441  
[7] Finn, M., Walton, M., & Elliott-White, M. (2000). Tourism and leisure research methods: Data  
collection, analysis, and interpretation. Harlow: Pearson Education.  
[8] Haahti, A. (2006). Experience design management as creation of identity economies: Reflections from  
periphery on entrepreneurial designs in tourism. Paper presented at the Environment – Sixth  
international conference: Entrepreneurship in United Europe – Challenges and opportunities, Sunny  
Beach, Bulgaria.  
[9] Jauhari, V., & Bharwani, S. (2017). An exploratory study of competencies required to cocreate  
memorable customer experiences in the hospitality industry Hospitality Marketing and Consumer  
Behavior (pp. 159-185): Apple Academic Press.  
[10]Jennings, G. (2005). Interviewing: a focus on qualitative techniques. In C. Ritchie, B. W. Burns, & C.  
Palmer (Eds.), Tourism research methods, integrating theory with practice (pp. 88-118). Wallingford:  
CABI Publishing UK.  
[11]Li, X., & Petrick, J. F. (2008). Tourism marketing in an era of paradigm shift. Journal of Travel  
Research, 46(3), 235-244. doi:10.1177/0047287507303976  
[12]Lichrou, M., O'Malley, L., & Patterson, M. (2008). Place‐product or place narrative (s)? Perspectives  
in the Marketing of Tourism Destinations. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 16(1), 27-39.  
doi:10.1080/09652540701794429  
[13]Lugosi, P., & Walls, A. R. (2013). Researching destination experiences: Themes, perspectives and  
challenges. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 2(2), 51-58.  
doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.07.001  
[14]Mathisen, L. (2013). Staging natural environments: A performance perspective. Advances in Hospitality  
and Leisure, 9, 163-183. doi:10.1108/S1745-3542(2013)0000009012  
280  
                           
Pham Thi Lan Huong, Bao Quoc Truong-Dinh/ MICA 2018 Proceedings  
[15]Minkiewicz, J., Evans, J., & Bridson, K. (2014). How do consumers co-create their experiences? An  
exploration in the heritage sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 30(1-2), 30-59.  
doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.800899  
[16]Morgan, M. (2006). Making space for experiences. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 5(4), 305-  
313. doi:10.1057/palgrave.rlp.5100034  
[17]Morgan, M. (2007). Festival spaces and the visitor experience. In Casado-Diaz, M. Everett, & S.  
Wilson (Eds.), Social and cultural change: Making space(s) for leisure and tourism (pp. 113–130).  
Eastbourne: Lesiure Studies Association.  
[18]Neuhofer, B., Buhalis, D., & Ladkin, A. (2013). Experiences, co-creation and technology: A conceptual  
approach to enhance tourism experiences. Paper presented at the Tourism and Global Change: On the  
Edge of Something Big, Lincoln: Lincoln University.  
[19]Pine, B. J., Pine, J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre and every  
business a stage. Bostom, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.  
[20]Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value  
creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14. doi:10.1002/dir.20015  
[21]Prebensen, N. K., & Foss, L. (2011). Coping and co‐creating in tourist experiences. International  
Journal of Tourism Research, 13(1), 54-67. doi:10.1002/jtr.799  
[22]Prebensen, N. K., Vittersø, J., & Dahl, T. I. (2013). Value co-creation significance of tourist resources.  
Annals of Tourism Research, 42(July 2013), 240-261.  
[23]Räikkönen, J., & Honkanen, A. (2013). Does satisfaction with package tours lead to successful vacation  
experiences? Journal of Destination Marketing & Management, 2(2), 108-117.  
doi:10.1016/j.jdmm.2013.03.002  
[24]Ramaswamy, V., & Gouillart, F. J. (2010). The power of co-creation: Build it with them to boost  
growth, productivity, and profits. New York, NY: Free Press.  
[25]Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for  
social science students and researchers. London: Sage.  
[26]Santos-Vij, M. L., & Rodriguez, N. G. (2013). Internal marketing as a driver of market orientation and  
co-creation culture in the tourism sector. African Journal of Business Management, 6(13), 4707-4716.  
doi:10.5897/AJBM11.1717  
[27]Scott, N., Laws, E., & Boksberger, P. (2009). The marketing of hospitality and leisure experiences.  
Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, 18(2-3), 99-110. doi:10.1080/19368620802590126  
[28]Wang, T.-L., Tran, P. T. K., & Tran, V. T. (2017). Destination perceived quality, tourist satisfaction and  
word-of-mouth. Tourism Review, 72(4), 392-410. doi:10.1108/TR-06-2017-0103  
[29]Zouni, G., & Kouremenos, A. (2008). Do tourism providers know their visitors? An investigation of  
tourism experience at a destination. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 8(4), 282-297.  
doi:10.1057/thr.2008.30  
281  
                             
pdf 10 trang Thùy Anh 14560 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "An exploratory study of the perception of co-creation experience in the tourism industry: A case study in Danang city, Vietnam", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfan_exploratory_study_of_the_perception_of_co_creation_experi.pdf