The impact of online micro-influencers on behavioural intentions: The case of mobile phone customers in Ho Chi Minh city

Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
47  
The impact of online micro-influencers on behavioural  
intentions: The case of mobile phone customers  
in Ho Chi Minh City  
Kieu Anh Tai1*, Le Minh Duy1, Nguyen The Khai1  
1Ho Chi Minh City Open University, Vietnam  
ARTICLE INFO  
ABSTRACT  
DOI:10.46223/HCMCOUJS.  
econ.en.11.1.1309.2021  
The advances of the Internet and social media offer customers  
nowadays more opportunities to inform their decisions with product  
information - not only that promoted by the company but also  
content shared by micro-influencers. This study aims to investigate  
the impact of online micro-influencers on the customer’s  
behavioural intentions. A survey was conducted using convenience  
sampling with customers in Ho Chi Minh City who have bought or  
intended to buy smartphones upon viewing online product reviews.  
Data, upon having been collected and screened, included 371 usable  
responses and were analysed using PLS-SEM. Results show that the  
customer’s perceptions of opinion leadership of micro-influencers  
and their parasocial interactions with micro-influencers positively  
influence the customer’s behavioural intentions (intention to follow  
the advice and intention to recommend) through message quality.  
Managerial implications are also discussed in the paper.  
Received: November 12th, 2020  
Revised: January 23rd, 2021  
Accepted: January 26th, 2021  
Keywords:  
online opinion leaders, micro-  
influencers, parasocial  
interactions, behavioural  
intentions, smartphone  
1. Introduction  
In traditional marketing communications, information source could be either the businesses  
called as advertisers disseminating messages about their products or services to the customers or  
famous individuals called as celebrities or key opinion leaders (KOL), who are able to influence  
the public’s opinions and behaviour due to their expertise or attractiveness appeal (Stokburger-  
Sauer & Hoyer, 2009). Indeed, much research has been done on the latter type of information  
source, having focused on celebrities as influencers or opinion leaders. Those studies investigated  
either the influence of celebrities' personal traits, the congruence of their image that brands want  
to leverage on secondary brand associations (Gentina, Butori, & Heath, 2014; Min, Chang, Jai, &  
Ziegler, 2019); or the impact of celebrities' endorsement thanks to their image or reputation or the  
customer's engagement with the celebrity on the consumer's attitude and buying behaviour (Ilicic  
& Webster, 2014).  
With the advances of the Internet and social network sites, consumers are increasingly  
given the opportunity to access more information channels and sources of information to evaluate  
alternatives and make purchase decisions. On online forums and social network sites (social  
media), there has emerged a number of individuals, through their social media accounts to create,  
contribute and share useful content for another internet/ social media users, gradually forming a  
community of people that “follow”, interact and take into account their opinions. Those  
individuals, commonly known in practice as bloggers and vloggers, are also referred to as micro-  
48  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
influencers who influence others’ opinions in the internet environment. This type of social  
influencers, though having less number of followers than traditional celebrities, have more positive  
followers’ interactions (e.g., viewing or re-sharing), thereby generating higher communication  
effectiveness and efficiency (Abidin, 2016).  
Businesses and brands are increasingly interested in finding ways to leverage online “brand  
ambassadors” who are social media (e.g., YouTube or Facebook) bloggers presenting and  
reviewing on products or services that they tried out and promoted the product to other online users  
(Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). The information generated and spread by those social influencers is  
usually in the form of an image or a short video clip embedded with product message or textual  
description. The popularity of the blogger/vlogger phenomenon and user-generated content (UGC)  
has led to the rise of a new form of marketing “influencer marketing”, in which brands or  
businesses collaborate with online opinion leaders to promote their products or services (De  
Veirman, Cauberghe, & Hudders, 2017).  
Some research has focused on user-generated content (UGC), also called consumer-  
generated content (CGC), in terms of electronic word-of-mouth (EWOM) (Chatterjee, 2011;  
Trusov, Bucklin, & Pauwels, 2009). However, some researchers noticed the ephemeral nature of  
attention and inequal popularity of UGC (Susarla, Oh, & Tan, 2016). Recently, some researchers  
have paid attention to online opinion leaders, who could be either celebrity on social network  
platforms (Li, Lee, & Lien, 2012) or just individuals who have a lot of followers, share or interact  
(e.g., tweet or retweet) on online social platforms (De Veirman et al., 2017; Park & Kaye, 2017).  
Researchers suggested that online opinion leaders on online social platforms are  
necessarily not traditional celebrities (famous athletes or actors) and that the sharing content is not  
advertising, and even that the quality of image or video content may not be professional; so, it is  
needed to the persuasive cues about those online opinion leaders (Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). Prior  
research revealed that online opinion leaders were often seen as a reliable source of information,  
having a more positive impact on brand trust and purchase intent than the influence of conventional  
celebrities (Bijen, 2017; Djafarova & Trofimenko, 2019). Research also found that online opinion  
leaders, compared to traditional celebrities, were more likeable because of more frequent  
interactions and more likeliness of the promoting content to be positively rated by consumers  
(Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). Nonetheless, there has been scant research on the specific cues of  
persuasion concerning online opinion leaders on the online social platforms such as the consumer’s  
perception of their parasocial interactions with online opinion leaders (Sokolova & Kefi, 2020) or  
about the extent of the customer’s perceptions about an individual who can influence others’  
opinion online (Casaló, Flavián, & Ibáñez-Sánchez, 2020).  
This study aims to investigate the influence of the specific persuasive cues of online  
opinion leaders (parasocial interaction and online opinion leadership) on the consumer’s perceived  
message quality, which in turn affects the consumer’s behavioural intentions both relating to  
consumer behaviour (intention to follow the advice of online opinion leaders) and online opinion  
leader (intention to recommend the online opinion leaders to others). This research is theoretically  
significant as it contributes to bridging the above-described gap in the literature. In addition, this  
research also responds to the call for research in emerging market contexts like Vietnam, where  
marketing research is still limited with mixed evidence (Sheth, 2011), let alone research into online  
opinion leaders and their cues of persuasion in marketing communications. Furthermore, a report  
published by the research agency Indochina Research has shown Vietnam has high internet and  
social media penetration, with 66% and 64% of the population, respectively (Depouilly, 2019).  
That report also found 88% of their survey respondents indicated product information search as  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
49  
one of their digital activities, implying the context of online product reviews is of practical  
relevance and significance. Another synthetic statistic by We Are Social and Hootsuite (2019) also  
indicated a high penetration of smartphones, with also 96% of internet users accessing via mobile  
devices.  
2. Theoretical foundation and hypothesis development  
2.1. Elaboration Likelihood Method (ELM) model  
In communication studies, researchers often draw on ELM theory to explain how receivers  
(consumers) process information or cues exposed to them (Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). According to  
ELM model, there are two routes of information processing: The central route in which the  
receivers carefully and thoughtfully process the received information; and the peripheral route in  
which receivers rely on cues used by the communicator (such as the attractiveness of the  
information source), rather than to evaluate the merits of information or argument quality (Petty  
& Cacioppo, 1986). Also, Petty, Cacioppo, and Schumann (1983) proposed that information  
quality has a strong influence on attitude change only when receivers have the high motivation or  
high ability to evaluate information; otherwise, whether and the extent that receivers have  
attitudinal shift is strongly influenced by peripheral persuasive cues such as information sources.  
Drawing on ELM theory, previous studies often considered message/information quality (the  
quality of arguments) taking the central route and information source characteristics (e.g., source  
credibility) taking the peripheral route to influence consumers’ attitudes and behaviours (Le,  
Robinson, & Dobele, 2020; Mahapatra & Mishra, 2017). There is also research examining the  
impact of both source and message (Cheung & Thadani, 2012; Mahapatra & Mishra, 2017), as the  
two drivers of communication effectiveness in accordance with Hovland (1948)’s social  
communication theory.  
The current study also uses ELM theory as the theoretical foundation to devise hypotheses  
and research model to address the research objectives. Specifically, the study examines the  
relationship between the information source characteristics (namely, online opinion leadership and  
parasocial interaction) and the message (message quality) in influencing behavioural intentions in  
the online social platforms.  
2.2. Online opinion leadership  
In the Internet environment (including social media), due to the characteristics of short-  
lived attention to and disproportionate popularity of the information (Susarla et al., 2016), the role  
of opinion leaders (information source) is very important, especially with a huge amount of  
information available on the Internet, it is challenging for consumers to be able to process all  
information. Several studies into information source often incorporated opinion leadership – a  
personal source characteristic (Casaló et al., 2020; Le et al., 2020). Opinion leadership is defined  
as the extent to which an individual is perceived as a role model to others and the extent to which  
the information provided by that person is considered to be interesting and to be his or her  
persuasiveness (Casaló et al., 2020). Opinion leaders are those who have real expertise and  
experience with products or services, are searched for advice, or are able to disseminate  
information about products or services to others (Stokburger-Sauer & Hoyer, 2009).  
Thus, it can be argued in this research that the concept of opinion leadership can be  
extended to the online environment as online opinion leadership as the perceptions of a social  
platform-mediated individual as opinion leader that his or her information is seen interesting and  
has persuasive power. On social platforms, the concept of online opinion leaders can refer to either  
individual who has a broad knowledge or experience of a particular topic (expertise) or have many  
50  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
connections with others on social platforms; these individuals can disseminate information about  
products or services to others in the online environment (Goldenberg, Lehmann, Shidlovski, &  
Barak, 2006). Individuals are perceived by social network sites’ “friends” as the online opinion  
leaders can exert a certain influence on those “social friends” (Iyengar, Van den Bulte, & Valente,  
2010). Indeed, some research examined opinion leadership impacting behavioural intentions,  
independently of the message factor (Casaló et al., 2020).  
2.3. Parasocial interaction  
Parasocial interaction emerged from communication theory to explain the development of  
the relationship between personas on the mass media and receivers (Horton & Wohl, 1956).  
Labrecque (2014) defined parasocial interaction as the illusionary experience in which the  
consumer interacts with personas (mediated representations of celebrities or characters) as if they  
engage directly in a two-way relationship with that celebrity or character. This is a persuasive cue  
of information source (Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). In the context of the Internet and social media,  
the relationship between online opinion leaders and followers can sometimes be two-way because  
users can add comments or discuss content or receive feedback from mediated representatives  
(website/blog administrator) (Labrecque, 2014). However, the real opinion leader cannot respond  
to all requests or participate in real discussions with followers due to a large number of followers,  
hence the relationship between online influencers and followers are indeed parasocial interactions  
(Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). In this way, social platform users can establish relationships with online  
opinion leaders (bloggers/vloggers) by following or subscribing to their social channels/accounts  
and following the content that online influencers share. Thus, unlike Le et al. (2020)’s research  
including source intimacy that could be more of reciprocal relationship, this study considers  
parasocial interaction instead as the interpersonal source characteristic regarding online opinion  
leaders.  
2.4. Message quality  
Communication research has also paid considerable attention to the type of information  
about products or services that are informally spread between people and termed as word-of-mouth  
(WOM) (Anderson, 1998). The Internet and social media have led to a new form of WOM -  
electronic WOM (EWOM), which referred to information about products or services that is shared  
by online users to a large number of other online users (Hennig-Thurau, Gwinner, Walsh, &  
Gremler, 2004) and is conceptually similar to UGC or CGC terms often used in influencer  
marketing practice. Message quality is defined as the compelling strength of the arguments  
embedded in the content of the information (Bhattacherjee & Sanford, 2006)  
2.5. Behavioural intentions  
Prior research has examined the consequences of opinion leadership (Casaló et al., 2020)  
or final consequences of the causal path within the ELM (Le et al., 2020) that include behavioural  
intentions such as the intention to follow the advice of the opinion leader or the intention to  
recommend the message source. In the context of product reviews on social platforms, the current  
research investigated two behavioural intentions that are impacted by micro-influencership: The  
intention to follow the advice of the online opinion leader and the intention to recommend the  
social platform account/channel of the online opinion leader to others. The former captures the  
outcome favouring the firm and product embedded in the review, and the latter concerns the result  
in favour of the micro-influencer themselves. Intent to follow the advice is defined as the degree  
to which an individual thinks and follows the advice or reviews of online opinion leaders; and  
intention to recommend is the extent to which an individual is willing to refer (the social platform  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
51  
account/channel of) an online opinion leader to others with the same need or interest (Casaló et  
al., 2020).  
2.6. Development of hypothesis and research model  
Some prior EWOM research examined only the direct effects of both source and message  
factors on behavioural intentions (Cheung & Thadani, 2012) or only source characteristics (Casaló  
et al., 2020; Sokolova & Kefi, 2020). Those studies did not consider a basic tenet of ELM model  
regarding the causal relationship of two routes of information processing. When the motivation or  
ability to process information is low, the receiver follows a peripheral route to process cues, but  
gradually develops the ability to process the merits of information as in the central route (Petty &  
Cacioppo, 1986). When consumers start to search for product reviews from online opinion leaders  
or to connect (subscribe/follow) to online opinion leaders' channels/accounts, consumers may not  
be able to process tons of information (posts or reviews by online opinion leaders, comments and  
replies by them and other followers…). Therefore, consumers may first form perceptions of source  
cues, i.e. characteristics of the online opinion leader, then gradually with acquired knowledge and  
interactive experience with the source they develop the ability and motivation to process the  
information offered by the online opinion leader (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986).  
Le et al. (2020)’s research has shown both characteristics of the source - personal  
characteristics and the interpersonal characteristics, have significant effects on the consumer  
perceptions of the message quality. In a similar vein, in the online environment, online opinion  
leadership and parasocial interaction, which are two persuasive cues of the information source,  
can be argued to relate to the perceived quality of the message, because the appreciation of the  
source can lead to thorough processing of information and positive message evaluation (Petty &  
Cacioppo, 1986). The online opinion leader can also at times through their mediated  
representations interact with other users, thereby making others feel more attached to the source  
and trust the source’s posts or reviews (Casaló et al., 2020). Thus, it can be hypothesised:  
H1: Online opinion leadership has a positive influence on message quality  
H2: Parasocial interaction has a positive influence on message quality  
According to the ELM theory, the quality of the message (information or arguments) is a  
concept that is mostly processed in the central route, leading to the change in attitudinal evaluations  
and finally consumer behaviours (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). Indeed, WOM and EWOM research  
have demonstrated information characteristics such as information/message quality can influence  
intentions or actual behaviours (Cheung & Thadani, 2012; Sweeney, Geoffrey, & Mazzarol, 2012).  
In the current study, behavioural intentions include both the intention relating to what is embedded  
in the message spread by the one opinion leader (intention to follow advice) and intention relating  
to the online opinion leader themselves for their having good taste regarding specific buying  
circumstances. If UGC/CGC is assessed positively, consumers will be more likely to have  
behavioural intentions relating to products or services imbedded in the message that online opinion  
leaders create and share. Thus, it can be hypothesised that:  
H3: The message quality has a positive influence on the intention to follow the advice of  
the online opinion leader  
H4: The message quality has a positive influence on the intention to recommend the social  
platform account/channel of the online opinion leader to others  
Figure 1. presents a visual representation of the hypothesised relationships discussed above  
52  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
Figure 1. The proposed research model  
3. Methods  
The study adopted scales with good psychometric properties from previous studies to  
measure the concepts in the research model. Specifically, the scale of online opinion leadership (6  
items) is adopted from (Casaló et al., 2020); parasocial interaction (6 items) from Labrecque  
(2014); message quality (5 items) from Le et al. (2020); intention to recommend (3 items) from  
Al-Ansi, Olya, and Han (2019); and intention to follow advice (4 items) from Casaló et al. (2020).  
Respondents will rate the degree of agreement of the statements (observed variable) using the 5-  
point Likert scale.  
The questionnaire begins with screening questions to ensure that the criteria are met for  
selecting the survey respondents, who are consumers who view reviews about mobile phone  
products on social networking sites / online forums in the past 6 months in making a purchase or  
in planning to purchase. The scales are translated from English to Vietnamese and back-translated,  
then the original version and the back-translated version are compared, and adjustments are made  
to ensure the scale content equivalence. After being designed, the survey questionnaire was pilot-  
tested with 2 experts and 10 consumers to ensure that the questionnaire content is easy to  
understand, unbiased, and free of grammatical and format errors.  
Data was collected using the convenience sampling method, by sending survey  
questionnaires to consumers who have previously purchased or planned to buy a mobile phone  
and viewed reviews about mobile phones before buying or to plan for the purchase. Given the high  
penetration of mobile devices in Vietnam, this sampling method deems appropriate to reach the  
above described target population for this study. The mobile phone product was chosen because it  
was a high-involvement product and information search is often conducted before making a  
purchase. The questionnaire is developed on the Google Form and the link is emailed or posted to  
online social platforms such as Facebook or Zalo and online forum in August 2020. The  
respondents first indicated the social accounts (that is the micro-influencers) they have followed  
and watched, then rated the scale items in relation to their mentioned social accounts.  
4. Results and discussions  
4.1. Sample characteristics  
There were 453 returned responses. After 82 responses from those who did not view  
product reviews about mobile phones on social platforms were excluded, a data of 371 responses  
were usable for analysis using PLS-SEM. The demographic information of the sample is shown  
in Table 1 below.  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
53  
Table 1  
Sample descriptive statistics  
Demographic variables  
Frequency (n=371)  
Percentages (%)  
Gender  
Male  
149  
222  
40.2%  
59.8%  
Female  
Age  
18-25  
108  
186  
61  
29.1%  
50.1%  
16.4%  
4.3%  
26-35  
36-45  
Above 45  
Education  
Up to high school  
University  
61  
266  
44  
16.4%  
71.7%  
11.9%  
Postgraduate  
Occupation  
Employee  
200  
65  
59  
42  
5
53.9%  
17.5%  
15.9%  
11.3%  
1.3%  
Student  
Manager/ director  
Self-employed  
Other  
Income  
Below 12 million VND  
12 - just less than 20 million VND  
20 - just less than 30 million VND  
Above 30 million VND  
219  
99  
59.0%  
26.7%  
8.6%  
32  
21  
5.7%  
Source: The researcher’s data analysis  
4.2. Scale assessment  
Since the scales were adopted from previous studies, it is not necessary to evaluate the  
scales using the exploratory factor analysis method because the theoretical structures of the latent  
variables have been determined and it may be inappropriate to make subjective decisions such as  
the number of factors to be extracted or discovered (Hair, Black, Babin, & Anderson, 2010). As  
the current study use SmartPLS 3.2.7, the SmartPLS model includes a measurement model and  
structure model (Nguyen & Vu, 2020). After estimating the SmartPLS model, the study first  
examined the item reliability (outer loadings), the convergent validity and the discriminant validity  
of the scales. Both Cronbach's alpha and combined reliability (CR) coefficients were used to  
evaluate internal consistency with threshold > 0.7, and a few observed variables may have loadings  
54  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
just > 0.5 to be considered acceptable; and convergent validity is achieved when the average  
variance extracted (AVE) is greater than 0.5 (Hair, Hult, Ringle, & Sarstedt, 2016). The results in  
Table 2 show that most the scales have Cronbach's Alpha, CR and AVE values above the  
respective required thresholds, demonstrating the reliability and convergent validity of the scales  
measuring the concepts.  
Table 2  
The reliability and convergent validity  
Concepts  
Factor loadings Cronbach's  
Alpha  
CR  
AVE  
[0.812 - 0.877]  
[0.844 - 0.884]  
[0.749 - 0.865]  
[0.676 - 0.754]  
[0.690 - 0.827]  
0.864  
0.835  
0.874  
0.814  
0.851  
0.908  
0.901  
0.909  
0.865  
0.889  
0.711  
0.752  
0.667  
0.517  
0.573  
Intention to follow  
IF  
IR  
Intention to recommend  
Message quality  
MQ  
OL  
PS  
Online opinion leadership  
Parasocial interaction  
Source: The researcher’s data analysis  
Hair et al. (2016) proposed that the discriminant validity is assessed using the criteria of  
Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT) values of less than 0.9. Results in Table 3 shows that HTMT values  
of concept pairs are less than 0.9, the scales of the concepts achieve discriminant validity.  
Table 3  
Heterotrait-Monotrait Ratio (HTMT)  
Online  
Intention to Intention to Message  
opinion  
follow  
recommend quality  
leadership  
IF  
IR  
MQ  
OL  
0.883  
0.773  
0.690  
0.830  
Intention to recommend  
Message quality  
IR  
0.791  
0.685  
0.846  
MQ  
0.686  
0.740  
Online opinion leadership OL  
0.722  
Parasocial interaction  
PS  
Source: The researcher’s data analysis  
4.3. Structural model and hypothesis testing  
The result of the multi-collinearity test from the SmartPLS output shows that the maximum  
VIF value of latent variables is 1.566; thereby multi-collinearity being not an issue in this research.  
The coefficients of determination (R²) of the intention to follow advice (IF) and the intention to  
recommend (IR) are 0.455 and 0.459 respectively, showing that with the research data, the model  
explains 45.5%. and 45.9% respectively of the variation of intention to follow (IF) and intention  
to recommend (IR). In addition, the R² value of message quality (MQ) is 0.477, indicating that  
47.7% variation of message quality (MQ) is explained by two concepts of online opinion  
leadership (OL) and parasocial interaction (PS). Besides R², another means of assessing predictive  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
55  
accuracy that is Q² was also calculated using SmartPLS blindfolding procedure with omission  
distance of six. Results also show that Q² of intention to follow (IF), intention to recommend (IR)  
and message quality (MQ) are 0.297, 0.319 and 0.287, respectively; all are larger than zero,  
indicating that these endogenous variables have predictive relevance with their respective  
predecessors (Hair, Jeffrey, Sarstedt, & Christian, 2019).  
The results of testing the structural model by the bootstrapping method (Figure 1) show  
that the online opinion leadership (OL) has a significant, positive impact on the message quality  
(MQ) (β = 0.315; p <0.001) and parasocial interaction (PS) also has a significant, positive impact  
on the message quality (MQ) (β = 0.455; p <0.001). Therefore, hypotheses H1 and H2 are  
supported. The results also show that the message quality (MQ) has a significant, positive impact  
on the intention to follow (IF) (β = 0.667; p <0.001) as well as on the intention to recommend (IR)  
(β = 0.682; p < 0.001). Therefore, hypothesis H3 and H4 are supported.  
Figure 2. Testing of structural equation model (using bootstrapping)  
Note: *** Statistically significant at p<0.001  
With all hypotheses having been supported based on estimation using the bootstrapping  
method, according to Preacher and Hayes (2008), it is possible to conclude the mediating role of  
message quality in the relationship between the source characteristics and consumers’ behavioural  
intentions. Table 4 presents the results of the indirect effects of the SmartPLS-based structural  
equation modelling by bootstrapping. The results provided further evidence of the mediating role  
of message quality (all p-values below 0.05), with total indirect effects of parasocial interaction  
on both behavioural intentions via message quality being larger than those of online opinion  
leadership.  
Table 4  
Indirect effects  
Sample Mean Standard Deviation T Statistics  
P Values  
0.000  
OL -> MQ -> IF  
PS -> MQ -> IF  
OL -> MQ -> IR  
PS -> MQ -> IR  
0.215  
0.309  
0.216  
0.311  
0.040  
0.047  
0.041  
0.047  
5.260  
6.516  
5.175  
6.641  
0.000  
0.000  
0.000  
Source: The researcher’s data analysis  
56  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
4.4. Discussions  
Research results show that online opinion leadership and parasocial interaction have a  
positive effect on message quality; and in turn, message quality positively affects both the intention  
follow advice (i.e., to respond to the product information embedded in the message) spread by the  
online opinion leader and the intention relating the online opinion leader (to recommend to others).  
More generally, in this research, the source and message characteristics both play a role in driving  
consumers’ behavioural intentions. This overall finding is consistent with the studies such as  
Cheung and Thadani (2012) examining both source and message influence on customer  
behavioural intentions; as well as is consistent with studies into the influence of source  
characteristics such as online opinion leadership (Casaló et al., 2020) or parasocial interaction  
(Sokolova & Kefi, 2020) on behavioural intentions.  
Unlike many previous studies, this study examines the causal relationships between source  
and message characteristics in line with the causality between two routes of persuasion stipulated  
in the ELM theory (Petty & Cacioppo, 1986). The findings in this study are broadly consistent  
with Le et al. (2020) in that perceptions of source characteristics lead to the perceptions of message  
quality and subsequently to the consumer’s behavioural intention. However, Le et al. (2020)  
considered interpersonal relationship characteristic of information source being represented by  
source intimacy - a close relationship or bond with the source as if in a reciprocal relationship. In  
the context of the Internet and social media, it is not always possible that the online opinion leaders  
interact or have real relationships with their followers, so this study considers the interpersonal  
relationship characteristic of the source to be represented by perceptions of parasocial relationship  
in which the source may not know the followers but can still have an influence on their behaviour  
(Labrecque, 2014).  
In this study, message quality acts as a mediating variable in the relationship between  
source characteristics and customer behavioural intention. According to Kenny (2008), it is not  
necessary to assess whether there is partial or full intermediation. Although some studies found  
that source characteristics can have a direct influence on behavioural intentions (Casaló et al.,  
2020; Cheung & Thadani, 2012; Sokolova & Kefi, 2020); this study focuses on the causal  
mechanism in line with ELM theory and the parsimony requirement of theory.  
5. Conclusion  
This research contributes to the advances of information processing theories related to  
consumers who process persuasive cues and information about the products or services exposed  
to them through the online environment. The result on the mediating role of the message quality  
also provides support for the causality of the information processing routes in accordance with the  
ELM model when consumers are exposed to a huge amount of information on the online platforms  
and are unable to process the information thoroughly. Moreover, the research also contributes  
evidence on information procession theories and the application of ELM theory in the emerging  
market context, which is an important marketing context where current research is scant.  
The results of this research also provide implications for managers to build digital  
marketing strategies incorporating influencer marketing and EWOM marketing. Although UGCs  
are non-commercial and influencers may not be for monetary benefits, marketers can still influence  
influencers on social platforms and their generated and disseminated content (arguments).  
Specifically, marketers need to detect influencers on online social platforms and target them with  
appropriate communication strategies, so that this audience will be the creator and distributor of  
UGCs affecting final consumers. In addition, the finding of the mediating role of message quality  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
57  
shows that once consumers move from the peripheral cue processing route to the central  
information merit processing route, the marketers must also monitor and assess the consumer’s  
perceptions of the message quality through the online opinion leaders. The result also shows that  
a micro-influencer when conveying a quality message about the business's products or services  
not only benefits the business but also themselves.  
Like any other study, this study has some limitations that may be considered for venues for  
future research. This study was a cross-sectional survey, so in the future, it is possible to combine  
other methods such as longitudinal studies to increase the generalisability of the results.  
Questionnaires were sent to potential respondents in the Ho Chi Minh City area, so to generalise  
and confirm the results found in this study, future studies may need to be expanded to a sample in  
the larger geographic area such as other regions in Vietnam and other countries. In addition,  
research may also need to be considered with other product and service categories. Finally, in this  
study, the message factor was operationalised as message quality, and future research may consider  
other message characteristics that may also influence consumer behavioural intentions.  
References  
Abidin, C. (2016). Visibility labour: Engaging with Influencers’ fashion brands and #OOTD  
advertorial campaigns on Instagram. Media International Australia, 161(1), 86-100.  
Al-Ansi, A., Olya, H. G. T., & Han, H. (2019). Effect of general risk on trust, satisfaction, and  
recommendation intention for halal food. International Journal of Hospitality Management,  
83, 210-219.  
Anderson, E. W. (1998). Customer satisfaction and word of mouth. Journal of Service Research,  
1(1), 5-17.  
Bhattacherjee, A., & Sanford, C. (2006). Influence processes for information technology  
acceptance: An Elaboration Likelihood Model. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 805-825.  
Bijen, Y. J. (2017). #AD: The effects of an influencer, comments and product combination on  
brand image. (Master's thesis). University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands.  
Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Ibáñez-Sánchez, S. (2020). Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents  
and consequences of opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 117, 510-519.  
Chatterjee, P. (2011). Drivers of new product recommending and referral behaviour on social  
network sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 77-101.  
Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth  
communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems,  
54(1), 461-470.  
De Veirman, M., Cauberghe, V., & Hudders, L. (2017). Marketing through Instagram influencers:  
The impact of number of followers and product divergence on brand attitude. International  
Journal of Advertising, 36(5), 798-828.  
Depouilly, X. (2019). Vietnam in the digital era: Evolution, impacts and social considerations.  
Retrieved  
November  
1,  
2020,  
from  
content/uploads/1912-Digital-Vietnam-2019-by-Indochina-Research.pdf  
Djafarova, E., & Trofimenko, O. (2019). ‘Instafamous’ - Credibility and self-presentation of micro-  
celebrities on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 22(10), 1432-1446.  
58  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
Gentina, E., Butori, R., & Heath, T. B. (2014). Unique but integrated: The role of individuation  
and assimilation processes in teen opinion leadership. Journal of Business Research, 67(2),  
83-91.  
Goldenberg, J., Lehmann, D. R., Shidlovski, D., & Barak, M. M. (2006). The role of expert versus  
social opinion leaders in new product adoption. Marketing Science Institute Reports  
(Working Paper Series), 6(4), 67-84.  
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th  
ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.  
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on Partial Least Squares  
Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.  
Hair, J. F., Jeffrey, J. R., Sarstedt, M., & Christian, M. R. (2019). When to use and how to report  
the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24.  
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-  
mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves  
on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1), 38-52.  
Horton, D., & Wohl, R. R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction. Psychiatry,  
19(3), 215-229.  
Hovland, C. I. (1948). Social communication. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society,  
92(5), 371-375.  
Ilicic, J., & Webster, C. M. (2014). Investigating consumer-brand relational authenticity. Journal  
of Brand Management, 21(4), 342-363.  
Iyengar, R., Van den Bulte, C., & Valente, T. W. (2010). Opinion leadership and social contagion  
in new product diffusion. Marketing Science, 30(2), 195-212.  
Kenny, D. A. (2008). Reflections on mediation. Organizational Research Methods, 11(2),  
353-358.  
Labrecque, L. I. (2014). Fostering consumer-brand relationships in social media environments:  
The role of parasocial interaction. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 28(2), 134-148.  
Le, T. D., Robinson, L. J., & Dobele, A. R. (2020). Word-of-mouth information processing routes:  
The mediating role of message and source characteristics. Journal of Consumer Behaviour,  
19(2), 171-181.  
Li, Y.-M., Lee, Y.-L., & Lien, N.-J. (2012). Online social advertising via influential endorsers.  
International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 16(3), 119-154.  
Mahapatra, S., & Mishra, A. (2017). Acceptance and forwarding of electronic word of mouth.  
Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 35(5), 594-610.  
Min, J. H. J., Chang, H. J. J., Jai, T.-M. C., & Ziegler, M. (2019). The effects of celebrity-brand  
congruence and publicity on consumer attitudes and buying behavior. Fashion and Textiles,  
6(1), 1-19.  
Nguyen, H. M., & Vu, T. H. (2020). Phân tích dữ liệu áp dụng mô hình PLS - SEM [Data analysis  
using PLS - SEM model]. Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam: NXB Kinh Tế Thành Phố Hồ Chí Minh.  
Park, C. S., & Kaye, B. K. (2017). The tweet goes on: Interconnection of Twitter opinion leadership,  
network size, and civic engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 174-180.  
Kieu Anh Tai et al. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science, 11(1), 47-59  
59  
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral  
routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.  
Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Schumann, D. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising  
effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2),  
135-146.  
Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and  
comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3),  
879-891.  
Sheth, J. N. (2011). Impact of emerging markets on marketing: Rethinking existing perspectives  
and practices. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 166-182.  
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020). Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy?  
How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions. Journal of  
Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, Article 101962.  
Stokburger-Sauer, N. E., & Hoyer, W. D. (2009). Consumer advisors revisited: What drives those  
with market mavenism and opinion leadership tendencies and why? Journal of Consumer  
Behaviour, 8(2/3), 100-115.  
Susarla, A., Oh, J.-H., & Tan, Y. (2016). Influentials, imitables, or susceptibles? Virality and  
Word-of-Mouth conversations in online social networks. Journal of Management  
Information Systems, 33(1), 139-170.  
Sweeney, J. C., Geoffrey, N. S., & Mazzarol, T. (2012). Word of mouth: Measuring the power of  
individual messages. European Journal of Marketing, 46(1/2), 237-257.  
Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus traditional  
marketing: Findings from an Internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5),  
90-102.  
We Are Social, & Hootsuite. (2019). Digital 2019 - Vietnam. Retrieved November 1, 2020, from  
pdf 13 trang Thùy Anh 16600 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "The impact of online micro-influencers on behavioural intentions: The case of mobile phone customers in Ho Chi Minh city", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfthe_impact_of_online_micro_influencers_on_behavioural_intent.pdf