Evaluating the knowledge of small and medium enteprises’ managers in presenting the information on financial statements toward international integration

ISSN 2588-1299  
VJAS 2020; 3(3): 689-699  
Vietnam Journal  
of Agricultural  
Sciences  
Evaluating the Knowledge of Small and  
Medium Enteprises’ Managers in Presenting  
the Information on Financial Statements  
toward International Integration  
Phi Thi Diem Hong, Phan Le Trang, Nguyen Thi Hai Binh & Tran  
Nguyen Thi Yen  
Faculty of Accounting and Business Management, Vietnam National University of  
Agriculture, Hanoi 131000, Vietnam  
Abstract  
In the context of international integration, managers’ knowledge  
plays an important role as a valuable organizational resource from a  
strategic perspective and a foundation for competitive advantage in  
business environment. The aim of this paper was to build assessment  
model and attest it in the case of Vietnam’s Small Medium  
Enterprises (SMEs) regarding manager’s knowledge in preparing the  
information on financial statements. By analyzing current relative  
standards (including international and national systems) and two  
basic assessment models (ASK by Bloom et al. (1956) and BKD by  
Shinseki (1999)), the study developed to identify the assessment  
criteria of the manager’s knowledge as one main research objective.  
The research data of 71 SMEs in the sample showed that: (i)The  
relationship between managers’ background and their understanding  
about information on their financial statements was a negative  
linkage; (ii) The number of managers using their financial statements  
to make a business decision was very low; and (iii) The most  
important criteria on the financial statement in their views were  
profits and revenues.  
Keywords  
Knowledge of managers, SMEs, financial statements, international  
integration  
Introduction  
According to the World Bank (2013), the “skilled workforce is  
central to the success of Vietnam’s economic and social transitions”  
(World Bank, 2013). Unfortunately, the report of VCCI (2016) shows  
that Vietnam is a country with a low ranking among ASEAN  
countries in corporate governance, the lack of management capacity  
and scale limitation are the major barriers to contribute to this status.  
Consequently, the Vietnamese government needs to focus on financial  
Received: June 11, 2020  
Accepted: August 26, 2020  
Correspondence to  
689  
Evaluating the knowledge of SMEs’ managers in presenting the information on financial statements  
information transparency or improve the quality  
of enterprise financial statements (World Bank,  
2016). For the SMEs, the low workforce skills  
are mentioned as the key obstacle to enhance  
their competitiveness and linkages (World Bank,  
2017). Therefore, the improvement of the  
management capacity in corporate governance is  
a strong current important content to develop the  
SMEs in Vietnam. Moreover, the major tendency  
of international economic integration occurs in  
not only one but also most countries. In such a  
context, international integration strategy  
becomes increasingly important to SMEs (Phi  
Thi Diem Hong, 2017). Currently, however, the  
SMEs manager’s knowledge in using financial  
information is still limited, their information  
performing on financial statements (supplying  
for internal and external users) has been  
continuously inefficient and short of necessary  
institutions to assist the improvement process  
(ibid).  
about the information presenting on the financial  
statements will be significant to determine the  
quality (reliability) of the financial statements  
that they or their units have prepared. From this  
perspective, this paper focuses on identifying  
criteria to serve as a basis for identifying and  
assessing the status of the management's  
knowledge about the presentation of financial  
statements, thereby proposing recommendation  
to improve the quality of financial statements and  
access to information from businesses.  
Based on a literature overview of "knowledge"  
and "evaluation" publications and the basic  
international accounting standards (IFRS)  
application, the research designed a research  
framework to build an assessment model of the  
managers’ knowledge in the presentation of  
information and preparation of financial  
statements. Then, the research applied this model  
to attest in a sample of 71 SMEs to reveal the status  
of their manager’s knowledge in financial  
statements. The research findings would be  
significant references for next studies in accounting  
as well as human resources besides being applied  
as the background of other further research to  
measure the knowledge of anyone in many other  
aspects.  
Nguyen Viet Loc (2012) argues that  
management capacity, leadership skills,  
competitiveness and operating activities of  
enterprises are positively affected by the  
knowledge of SMEs managers. Additionally,  
innovation as the core value of an  
entrepreneur absolutely depends on the  
managers’ knowledge (Le Thi Phuong Thao,  
2016); in which, the knowledge of financial  
accounting is one of the three most essential  
knowledge for a chief of executive (CEO) to  
improve their operating capacity (Le Quan &  
Nguyen Quoc Khanh, 2012).  
Materials and Methods  
A review and thematic analysis were carried  
out on publications with the objective of  
developing a comprehensive framework. At first,  
the early research of “knowledge” and  
“evaluation” besides the international financial  
reporting standards was reviewed and compared,  
then the models of knowledge assessment were  
analyzed. The findings of these steps were the  
background to develop the research model of  
managers’ knowledge assessment as a part of the  
whole research result. The research objectives  
were reached by applying this model into the  
SMEs to attest the manager’s knowledge in the  
presentation of information on financial  
statements. Wherein, the managers who were  
mentioned in this study were limited in business  
entities, including directors, vice-directors, chief  
executive officers, leaders of Accounting  
department, or any member of the board of  
In fact, most Vietnamese enterprises have  
already attained the controlling information  
systems, but that still does not meet the needs of  
corporate governance (VCCI, 2016). Many  
business owners have graduated from university  
(nearly 60%), but their transformation and  
communication are not effective, even  
inconsistent and out of date. Notably, only a few  
business owners currently have in-depth training  
in economic knowledge, corporate governance,  
business law, and corporate accounting (VCCI,  
2016). Meanwhile, the manager's understanding  
of financial accounting has a direct impact on  
attracting investment capital for businesses. An  
accurate assessment of the manager's knowledge  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
690  
Phi Thi Diem Hong et al. (2020)  
directors. The model application for SMEs only  
concentrated on collecting the preliminary result  
that was not an entire survey to reflect all  
academic criteria of the information on the  
financial statements.  
also used to find the harmonize area between  
IFRSs and VASs as the accounting environment  
to assess their managers’ knowledge in  
presenting information on SMEs’ financial  
reports. The research combines the key points of  
formal financial reports (including measurement  
and recognition) following both IFRS and VASs  
to identify the evaluation criteria in the research  
framework.  
Literature review and research model of  
assessing human capacity  
From the literature review, it is found that  
the topic of "knowledge" has been studied early  
since many years BC (Hunt, 2003). Over the  
time, its context has been explored in different  
directions depending on the approach and  
evaluation purposes of the research subject. Most  
of the viewpoints agree that knowledge is a good  
thing to have (in the sense of being conducive to  
successful practical action) (Olsson, 2011). It  
includes two components: latent (Tacit) and  
exposing (Explicit) (Bloom et al., 1956; Nonaka  
& Takeuchi, 1995). Many researchers mentioned  
the term of manager’s knowledge in the business  
leadership of managers or business executives. In  
order to measure the managers’ knowledge, the  
evaluating criteria also have been discussed in  
different ways. Most researchers agree that the  
evaluation is an assessment of achievement (or  
matching) between the results (reliable output or  
outcome) and the objectives (or expected  
results). Following this point, this study used the  
models of ASK (Attitude - Skill - Knowledge) by  
Bloom (1956-1964) and BKD (Be-Know-Do) by  
Shinseki (1999) which are known as the  
background of assessment on leader or manager  
capacity (Le Quan & Nguyen Quoc Khanh, 2012;  
Tran Thi Phuong Hien, 2014).  
Sample survey and Likert approach  
In order to provide the evidence in practical  
cases, a sample of managers in the SMEs was  
selected to be included in the survey. Using  
“snowballing”, the sample was designed through  
the researchers’ own network to lead to another  
network that was derived from the supports of the  
researchers’ colleagues, students, or potential  
interviewees. Through a set of open-ended  
questionnaires, each interview lasted from 30 to  
60 minutes, followed by specific and academic  
questions. Following the assessing model as the  
first steps of research, the measurement of each  
assessing content was separated into different  
questions. A group of them used qualitative  
statistics, while others applied the Likert scale for  
the purpose of data collection. The 5-point Likert  
scale was used to analyze the level of  
understanding or using the information by the  
managers, while the qualitative statistics was  
used to explore managers’ experience or  
presenting skills. Depending on exact  
information with the objective of assessment, the  
questionnaires were set either academic or  
general. A successful collection meant at least  
over 80% of questions obtaining information or  
not the same answer for all questions.  
International Financial Reporting Standard  
(IFRS) and Vietnam Accounting Standard  
(VAS)  
The survey questionnaire was sent out to  
about 180 interviewees who worked in different  
SMEs mainly from March to December in 2018.  
Through both direct and indirect meetings, the  
interviewees were general managers, directors,  
assistant directors, or functional managers, but  
there were only 75 valid responses, including 4  
cases of asymmetric industries (non-business or  
Nowadays, in the accounting sector or the  
financial statement aspect, most people mention  
IFRS as a generally accepted accounting  
principle (GAAP) for international integration or  
harmonization. Under this line, the IFRS – as the  
current international standard has been selected  
to be the formal standards to evaluate the  
integrating level or the information needs  
presented or displayed on business financial  
statements in this research. Additionally, most  
SMEs are Vietnamese enterprises, the VASs are  
government administrative  
organizations).  
Finally, the results were found based on 71  
formal responses as planned (suitable position  
and all of the questions answered, etc.).  
691  
Evaluating the knowledge of SMEs’ managers in presenting the information on financial statements  
9, VAS 21). This means financial information  
Results and Discussion  
(on financial reports) is useful if it is relevant and  
faithfully represents what it purports to represent.  
The usefulness of financial information is  
enhanced if it is comparable, verifiable, timely,  
and understandable (IASB, 2018). Notably,  
relevant financial information is capable of  
making a difference in the decisions made by  
users. To keep relevant requirements, the  
information must be material that the materiality  
is an entity-specific aspect of relevance based on  
nature or magnitude, or both, of the items to  
which the information relates in the context of an  
individual entity’s financial report (IASB, 2018).  
The faithful information is been reflected in the  
words and the numbers on enterprises’ financial  
statements.  
Assessment model of SMEs managers’  
knowledge in presenting financial information  
Financial information and identification of  
assessing criteria on financial statements  
Following the Conceptual Framework for  
the Preparation and Presentation of Financial  
Statements by the International Accounting  
Standard Board (IASB), “Financial statements  
are prepared and presented for external users by  
many entities around the world” (IASB, 2018).  
Despite available differences when setting  
national requirements among different countries,  
the financial statements may appear similar from  
country to country. Under the current VASs and  
international accounting regulations, a complete  
set of financial statements normally includes the  
following four components: (i) Balance sheet;  
(ii) Income statement; (iii) Cash flow statement;  
and (iv) Notes to the financial statements. To  
achieve a fair presentation, financial statements  
should be prepared and presented in compliance  
with prevailing accounting standards, accounting  
policies, and related regulations (Articles 7 and  
Typically, the words and numbers on the  
financial statements are only useful if the users  
can meet their needs (effectiveness) when they  
apply these reports for their purposes. The more  
users apply the financial information of the  
enterprise, the more effectiveness is obtained.  
Consequently, the number of users reflects  
Comparable  
Verifiable  
Measurement  
(i)Relevant  
Material  
(ii)Faithful  
Timely  
Recognition  
Understand  
Financial Statements  
General Accounting  
Accepted Principles  
Accounting Techniques  
Numbers  
Words  
FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
Transparrency and usefulness  
Meet the demand of different  
type of target of users  
Low cost or expected expenses of  
enterprises  
Useful for users (or  
enterprise)  
Economic  
Effectiveness  
Professionalism  
Figure 1. The assessment criteria of fundamental qualitative financial statement (following IFRS and VAS)  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
692  
Phi Thi Diem Hong et al. (2020)  
professionalism in presentation. The cost of  
financial statement preparation or application at  
the lowest (or expected expenses) reflects the  
economic presentation.  
on the research conditions or aspects, the  
evaluation process can be designed in different  
methods (qualitative or quantitative), but most of  
them tend to satisfy the following three purposes:  
(i) Development; (ii) Accountability; and (iii)  
Knowledge; in which, the evaluation for  
knowledge is often aimed to generate  
understanding and explanation (Federica, 2006).  
Evaluating model of the SMEs managers’  
knowledge in presenting the information on  
financial statements  
As the conclusion of the previous section, a  
useful financial statement implies that their  
information covers all requirements of  
effectiveness, economic, and professionalism.  
This strongly depends on the knowledge of  
presenters who are often following their  
managers, at least in an enterprise. In other  
words, the managers’ knowledge in financial  
statements indirectly influences financial  
information presentation, at least in the  
managerial sense. As the review progressed, the  
study developed assessment criteria of  
managers’ knowledge to identify the evaluating  
model of the SMEs managers’ knowledge in  
presenting financial information.  
According to the Organization for Economic  
Cooperation and Development (OECD), any  
evaluation for knowledge needs to clarify the  
purpose for which the map is being developed  
before proceeding to identify three key themes as  
follows: Know-What, Know-Why, Know-How,  
and Know-Who (Arisha & Ragab, 2013).  
Actually, up to now, numerous studies have  
attempted to set up the assessing model  
following these themes. Two of them are very  
famous and comprehensive reviews that are ASK  
by Bloom et al. (1956) and BKD by Shinseki  
(1999). In light of the human resource  
management proposed in an organization, Bloom  
(1956) built three dimensions: Attitude, Skills  
and Knowledge. His research shows the manager  
Generally, according to Kucza (2001), a  
manager’s knowledge also includes two  
components: tacit knowledge and explicit  
knowledge, wherein the tacit knowledge is the  
knowledge in the manager’s mind and is difficult  
to handle. It is quite different from explicit  
knowledge which is formalized knowledge that  
is recorded or performed as video, in a document  
or speech, etc., and usually covers part of the  
original tacit knowledge but is not a full  
representation of it. For a person (a manager),  
capacity combines  
a
lot of ability in  
comprehension, application, analysis, synthetic  
and evaluation (Le Quan & Nguyen Quoc Khanh,  
2012). For the purposes of the Army leadership  
framework, Shinseki (1999) developed the  
leadership focusing on character, competence,  
and excellence. In his opinion, the dimensions  
consist of Army values and subcategories under  
attributes, skills, and actions. This means a leader  
needs to know what he must BE, KNOW how to  
do, and DO what must do.  
knowledge is as “capacity to act” (Sveiby, 1997);  
but for an organization or enterprise, knowledge  
is an artery, a valuable asset, and a key to creating  
sustainable competitive advantages (Arisha &  
Ragab, 2013). It is also a part of the  
organization's performance management and  
operational assessment (Kucza, 2001). In fact,  
the knowledge of managers in SMEs mentioned  
is mostly related to the leadership ability of  
managers.  
Based on the ASK and BKD models,  
research has been expended to assess the  
business managers’ competence. The criteria of  
presenting the information on financial  
statements in SMEs following IFRSs  
(Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting)  
and VAS (Vietnamese Accounting Standards)  
have been reviewed. In which, the ability in  
recognition and measurement economic  
transactions to prepare and disclose information  
on financial statements (accounting outputs) are  
determined to evaluate the knowledge of the  
managers. Notably, from the view of users, this  
information needs to cover the consensus of all  
Regarding the evaluation of managers’  
knowledge, many discussions have been  
published. Most authors agree on the following  
three categories of the model: (i) effectiveness;  
(ii) economic; and (iii) professional. Depending  
693  
Evaluating the knowledge of SMEs’ managers in presenting the information on financial statements  
of three dimensions: economic, effectiveness (or  
efficiency), and professionalism. Economic  
means the preparation and presentation of  
financial statements with the lowest possible cost  
in the enterprise's resources. The effectiveness is  
analyzed in terms of useful information  
presented by users (at least effective for investors  
and regulatory agencies). Professionalism shows  
the contents of the criteria on the financial  
statements satisfy the users' demands.  
super-small busineses with charter capital under  
10 VND billion, among which manufactory  
enterprises (36.6%) were most popular.  
In the sample (as indicated by data from  
Table 2), most enterprises registered following  
the form of Limited Liability and Jointed Stock  
company at 40.8% and 54.9%, respectively.  
There were 85.9% of responses from private  
companies. They were mainly working as the  
directors or CEO (in 26.8%) and functional  
managers (53.5%) in their enterprises.  
Current status of SMEs managers’ knowledge  
in the presentation of information on financial  
statements  
As can be seen from Table 3, the majority of  
interviewees (around 81.3%) were from the  
group of 20-40 years old, only 15.5% of the  
sample were from 41-50 years old while the over  
50 and under 20 groups were limited at nearly  
2.8% and 1.4%, respectively. The interviewees  
working over 10 years accounted for only 9.9%  
in the total sample, while their experience was  
Sample descriptive statistics  
Among 71 available responses or SMEs  
(Table 1), most interviewees (49.3%) came from  
small enterprises with 10 to 50 employees. In  
contrast, there were 63.4% of interviewees from  
Figure 2. Assessment model of manager’s knowledge in presenting information on financial statements  
Table 1. Sample characteristics by Business Industries or Capital/Employees Size  
Size of capital (billion VND)  
Items Frequency Percent  
Number of employees (person)  
Field of business  
Items Frequency Percent  
Items  
< 10  
Frequency  
Percent  
9.9  
< 10  
10-20  
20-50  
50-100  
45  
15  
6
63.4  
21.1  
8.5  
7
35  
18  
5
Manufactory  
Trade and commerce  
Service  
26  
12  
14  
19  
36.6  
16.9  
19.7  
26.8  
10-50  
49.3  
25.4  
7.0  
50-100  
100-200  
200-300  
Total  
5
7.0  
Other (Multi-fields)  
6
8.4  
Total  
71  
100  
71  
100  
Total  
71  
100  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
694  
Phi Thi Diem Hong et al. (2020)  
Table 2. Sample characteristics by Interviewee’s Position, Business Formation, and Type of Capital  
Interviewee’s Position  
Items Frequency Percent  
Business formation  
Frequency Percent  
Type of owner’s capital  
Items  
Items  
Frequency Percent  
General  
manager  
3
2
4.2  
2.8  
Economic Group  
1
29  
39  
2
1.4  
40.8  
54.9  
2.8  
State Co.  
Foreign Co.  
Private Co.  
3
6
4.2  
8.5  
Cooperation/ joint  
stock Co.  
Chairman  
Directors and  
CEO  
19  
9
26.8  
12.7  
Limited Co.  
Partnership  
61  
1
85.9  
1.4  
Assistant  
director  
Multi-  
national Co.  
Functional  
manager  
38  
71  
53.5  
100  
Total  
Total  
71  
100  
Total  
71  
100  
Table 3. Characteristics of interviewees in sample  
Age  
Experience  
Frequency  
Vocational qualification  
Items  
(years)  
Frequency  
Percent  
Items (years)  
Percent  
Items  
Frequency  
Percent  
<20  
1
1.4  
< 1  
1-2  
1
6
1.4  
8.5  
Non-training  
1
3
1.4  
4.2  
20-30  
21  
29.6  
Short-training  
Vocational  
graduation  
31-40  
41-50  
51-65  
36  
11  
2
50.7  
15.5  
2.8  
Over 2-4  
Over 4-5  
Over 5-10  
19  
13  
25  
26.8  
18.3  
35.2  
5
54  
8
7.0  
Bachelor or  
equivalent  
76.1  
11.3  
Master or  
equivalent  
Over 10  
Total  
7
9.9  
Total  
71  
100.0  
71  
100.0  
Total  
71  
100  
mostly from 2 to under 10 years. About the  
vocational qualification, 76.1 % of interviewees  
of the sample had a Bachelor or equivalent  
degree.  
Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy) and  
Bartlett were conducted to attest all of the scales  
together to measure the dis-criminality and  
validity of scales. SPSS version 20 was  
employed to perform these tests. The result of  
Cronbach Alpha analysis is summarized in  
Table 5.  
Description of assessing criteria  
Based on the evaluation model and assessing  
criteria setting in Figure 2, the real observations  
about SMEs managers’ knowledge in presenting  
information on their financial reports' are  
suggested as follows (Table 4).  
(ii) Hypothesis test and ANOVA analysis  
In order to test the relationship between  
specific or academic answers of the interviewees  
and the factors according to firm size, position,  
educational level, and vocational qualification or  
working years (experience), ANOVA analysis  
including one way and two ways was used to test  
the null hypothesis (Ho): ‘the answers of  
interviewees do not depend on position, business  
size, educational level, vocational qualification,  
or experience’.  
Evaluation of the managers’ knowledge  
(i) Exploratory factor analysis and  
Cronbach alpha analysis  
At first, the assessment of the scales was  
carried out by Cronbach alpha testing in order to  
analyze the reliability of the individual scale,  
then the tests of KMO values (Kaiser-Meyer-  
695  
Evaluating the knowledge of SMEs’ managers in presenting the information on financial statements  
Table 4. Survey contents to assess the managers’ knowledge in the presentation of information on financial statements  
Main purpose of the assessment  
Variables/Questionnaire or survey contents  
(evaluation methods)  
1. What is your educational level?  
BE: Measure the background and experience or attitude of  
the manager  
2. Whichis the level of your vocationalqualification?  
3. How long do you work at the current position?  
- Method: mostly qualitative method  
- Criteria:  
+ For knowledge: educational level; vocational  
4.Whicharea/action do you relate to financialstatements?  
qualification; and fundamental knowledge in the structure  
of financial reports; accounting regulation system)  
5. Which accountingsystem do you apply when preparing financial  
statements?  
+ For experience: years of position; times of relating  
financial statements.  
6. Whichcomponents do yourfinancialstatements include/cover?  
1. What arethe reasons for preparinga financialstatement by an  
enterprise?  
KNOW: Measure/evaluate the preparation or presentation  
skills; the ability of understanding information; and analysis  
ability  
2. Howare yourfinancial statement contents or criteria onstatement  
designed orsetting? (by who?)  
- Method: Application of both qualitativemethod and Likert  
scales  
3. When are yourfinancialstatements prepared or published?  
4. In your opinion, what is afaithfulfinancial report?  
- Criteria:  
+ For understanding: purpose of financial statement or  
reasons for preparing financial statement; function of  
accounting staffs, etc.,  
5. What is yourmotivation to prepare theirfinancialstatement?  
6. Howdo you understand about theterms presented on a financial  
statement such as owner capital, inventory; receivable; and liability, etc.?  
+ For preparation: motivation of preparing; when/who  
prepare financial; etc.,  
(*)  
7. What do youthink about the roles of accounting staff in a enterprise?  
+ For analysis: which content/criteria to present; faithful  
financial reports; and explanation of the importance of  
each criterion; etc.  
8. Do you think themanagermust study accounting andfinancialsubjects?  
(*) Whichis a suitablecourse/program?  
DO: Measure the action of the manager in making  
decision using financial information  
1. Which of thefollowing criterion do you think needs to present on financial  
statement: revenues, expenses; andincome beforetax, etc.? (Please  
show which important level)(*)  
- Method: Application of both qualitative method and  
Likert scales  
2. For which purpose did you applythe information presented onfinancial  
statements?  
- Criteria:  
+ For setting up the criteria on the financial statements:  
criterion needs to present; etc.,  
3. Have you ever used financial informationtomake business decisions? If  
yes, howoften do you use?(*)  
+ For the purpose of preparing financial statements:  
explain the importance of financial information to business  
operation etc.  
4. Howdo youthink about the financialstatements’ quality duringlast time?  
(*)  
Note: (*) Using Likert scales to measure the level of assessing criterion (Likert 1: 1 = Zero/No; 2 = Little; 3 = Average; 4 = Good; 5 =  
Very good; Likert 2: 1 = Never; 2 = Rarely; 3 = Sometimes; 4 = Often/usually; 5 = Always; Likert 3: 1 = Empty; 2 = Very poor; 3 =  
Enough; 4 = Good; 5 = Very good).  
Table 5. Cronbach alpha analysis and exploratory factor analysis results  
KMO and Bartlett’s Test***  
Variables  
Items Items Cronbach alpha**  
Value  
sig  
Cumulative(%)  
66.66  
Preparing and setting financial criteria  
9
16  
4
9
16  
4
0.878  
0.981  
0.949  
0.946  
0.827 .000  
0.858 .000  
0.792 .000  
0.838 .000  
Understanding financial information  
84.71  
Knowledge of financial statements’ function and purpose  
Analysis quality of financial statements  
85.08  
4
4
78.13  
Note: ** the reliability of scales for individual factor is valid with Cronbach alpha >=0.6 and its correlation must be >=0.3  
*** KMO value requirements are greater than 0.5 with significance of .000 (< 0.05)  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
696  
Phi Thi Diem Hong et al. (2020)  
that only 26.8% of the sample often used their  
information on financial reports to make a  
business decision. Under the question of “What  
are the reasons for preparing financial statements  
by the enterprise”, the study found that over 40%  
(29/71) of the interviewees were confused  
between the regulations as compulsory and the  
gains of financial statement in business. A  
significant number of responses agreed that their  
enterprises still ran a business well without  
financial statements and their motivation of  
preparing financial reports was because they  
were compulsory by tax law.  
Findings  
Negative relationship between the  
interviewees’  
understanding of financial information on the  
financial statements  
background  
and  
their  
As aforementioned (Table 3), many  
managers of the sample had a Bachelor’s degree  
or its equivalent. Over 20% of them,  
nevertheless, believed that the financial  
statements were simply an accounting output  
under legal compliance. It is rising in some cases  
of strongly supporting the idea of these reports as  
controlling the accountant works in their  
enterprises. In their opinions, if their financial  
reports passed the tax official requirements, their  
accounting staff possessed good knowledge or  
high qualification.  
Although most interviewees believed that their  
financial statements were at good quality (the  
Likert’s score of 4 criteria, including timely,  
relevant, faithful, andmaterial)inassessingfinancial  
statement’s qualitywere popular at 4 on a scale from  
1 to 5, about 10% of the interviewed managers in the  
sample had never used the information from  
financial statements to run their business. There  
were only 8.5% who rarely and 14.1% who  
sometimes applied them.  
Additionally, almost all of the interviewees  
considered their knowledge as “good” (Likert’s  
core of 16 items in assessment of understanding  
financial information were from 3.58 to 3.97 on  
a scale of 1 to 5). They absolutely agreed,  
however, their financial statements strictly fit  
formal regulations rather than providing useful  
information to users or managerial purpose. It  
became more extreme because 5.6% of the  
interviewees supported the statement that the  
improvement of their knowledge was only  
important if there was a need to prevent  
accountanting fraud.  
Limited Profitable and revenue data as the  
most important criteria on the financial  
statements in the views of SMEs managers  
Among 9 items (revenues, expenses,  
retained earnings, taxation fees, receivables and  
payables, plant assets or long-term assets, and  
others) of a variable group of preparing and  
setting financial criteria on financial statements,  
the Likert’s scores were the highest in profitable  
and revenue items with 3.79 and 3.2,  
respectively, whereas the lowest was 1.87 at  
unusual or sub-information (belongs to “others”).  
Paradoxically, in many cases, the business  
decisions of investors came from the extra or  
specific information of “others’ items because  
these investors naturally wanted to collect much  
information out of report formation to enrich  
Limited number of managers using  
information on financial statements to make a  
business decision  
Most managers had good background  
knowledge of regulation for preparing financial  
reports with many correct answers in the criterion  
group of knowledge in regulations of the  
financial statements. The study found that over  
90% of the sample answered the question: which  
components under current regulation of financial  
statement correctly? Approximately 89% of the  
interviewees answered their accounting system  
under law exactly. Notably, more than 94% of  
the responses of the survey gave the name of  
accounting circulars (or regulations under the  
law in the accounting sector) that their financial  
their knowledge before making  
a
final  
investment decision. This reflects the fact that the  
SMEs managers concentrated vigorously on a  
short-coming rather than a long-term proposal. It  
also implies that it is are still challenging for the  
SMEs to improve their competitive advantage at  
the current manager’s capacity (at least the  
knowledge in preparing financial statements).  
reports  
must  
follow  
in  
preparation.  
Unfortunately, the collecting data also showed  
697  
Evaluating the knowledge of SMEs’ managers in presenting the information on financial statements  
Conclusions  
Managers’ knowledge in general and in  
References  
Arisha A. & Ragab M. (2013). Knowledge Management and  
Measurement: a Critical Review. Journal of Knowledge  
Management. 17(6): 873-901.  
particular about the preparation of the  
information on financial statements often relates  
closely to managers’ competence. The  
assessment model of SMEs manager’s  
knowledge in preparing the financial statements,  
as one of the research results, contributes  
significantly to active identification of manager’s  
knowledge as well as financial statement  
qualification. Based on this model, the evaluator  
would develop to assess the knowledge of  
anyone in many different sectors (not only  
accounting but also any other aspects).  
BloomB. S.,EngelhartM. D.,FurstE.J., HillW. H. &Krathwohl  
D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives- The  
Classification of Educational Goals. Published by David  
MckayCompany Inc. 216 pages.  
HuntD.P. (2003). Theconceptofknowledgeandhowtomeasure  
it. Journal of Intellectual Capital. 4(1):100-113.  
Federica C.-L. (2006). Evaluation: definitions, methods and  
models -An ITPS framework. Working paper, No.  
R2006:002, Swedish Institute For Growth Policy  
Studies,  
39  
pages.  
Retrieved  
from  
2018.  
For other findings, the research data of 71  
SMEs showed that most interviewees had limited  
knowledge in preparing financial statements. It  
seems more urgent that a significant number of  
them still misunderstood or could not apply the  
information on financial reports, especially in  
their skill of preparing, into presenting or  
analyzing cases. In other words, at the current  
manager’s knowledge in preparing financial  
statements, it was still difficult for the SMEs to  
take advantage in not only international but also  
national competitions. In order to improve this  
status, the recommendations include: (i) the  
managers should actively improve their  
knowledge by themselves; (ii) the current  
accounting standard system should be revised  
allowing much more international system  
harmonization; and (iii) the educational and  
training system should focus on providing the  
skills or capacity of learners rather than  
knowledge in theory.  
IASB (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Report.  
Retrieved  
from  
December18, 2019.  
KuczaT.(2001).KnowledgeManagementProcessModel.Espoo  
2001. Technical Research Centre of Finland, VTT  
Publications 455.101 p. + app. 3 p.  
Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating  
Company. Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York,  
1995.  
Nguyen Viet Loc (2012). Vietnamese entrepreneur cultural on the  
process of International Integration. Doctoral thesis. VNU  
University of Economics & Business. 186 pages (in  
Vietnamese).  
Le Thi Phuong Thao (2016). Study on the leadership capacity of  
managers of SMEs in the North Central Area in Vietnam.  
Doctoral thesis. VNU University of Economics & Business.  
Hue college of economics, Hue University. 165 pages (in  
Vietnamese).  
Le Quan & Nguyen Quoc Khanh (2012).Assessing competences  
of CEOs in Vietnamese small enterprises through ASK  
approach.VNU Journal of Science- Economics & Business.  
28(2012): 29‐35.  
Olsson E. J. (2011). The Value of Knowledge. Philosophy  
Compass. 6(12): 874-883.  
PhiThiDiemHong(2017).Acomprehensivestudyofaccounting  
Acknowledgements  
system  
and  
consolidated accounting in Vietnam: Focusing on the factor  
analysis of consolidatedfinancial statements. Doctoral thesis.  
Komazawa University, Tokyo, Japan.  
This research was supported by the Faculty  
of Accounting and Business Management,  
Vietnam National University of Agriculture. We  
thank the members of Faculty Board for their  
helpful comments on a previous draft of this  
paper and their suggestions on study design and  
analyses. We also would like to thank the SMEs  
managers who were the interviewees of this  
research.  
Shinseki E. K. (1999). Army Leadership: Be, Know, Do. Field  
ManualNo.22-100(FM22-100). Headquarters,Department  
of the Army. Washington, DC, 31 August 1999. 270 pages.  
SveibyK. E. (1997): The New Organisational Wealth, Managing  
and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets, Berrett-Koehler  
San Fransisco. CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. 236 p.  
Tran Thi Phương Tran Thi Phuong Hien (2014). Leadership  
competency of Vietnam CEOs ( research in Hanoi).Dotoral  
Vietnam Journal of Agricultural Sciences  
698  
Phi Thi Diem Hong et al. (2020)  
thesis.National Economics University. 167 pages (in  
Vietnamese).  
8176937722/Main-report on December 10, 2019.  
VCCI (2016). Provincial Competitiveness Index2015-PCI  
2015-Evaluate the quality of economic governance to  
promote business development. Labor Publishinh  
House, 2016. 106 pages (in Vietnamese).  
World Bank (2016). The Reports on the Observance of  
Standards and Codes (ROSC) - Accounting and  
Auditing Module, Vietnam 2016, Hong Duc  
Publishing House. ISBN: 978-604-89-1352-6.  
World Bank (2013).Vietnam development report 2014:  
Preparing the work force for a modern market  
economy (Vol. 2): Main report (English). Washington  
WorldBank(2017).Vietnam:EnhancingEnterpriseCompetitiveness  
and SME Linkages-Lessons from international and national  
experience, Trade and Competitiveness Global Practice the  
WorldBankGroup,PublicDisclosureAuthorized: 1-106.  
DC;  
World  
Bank.  
Retrieved  
from  
699  
pdf 11 trang Thùy Anh 9940 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "Evaluating the knowledge of small and medium enteprises’ managers in presenting the information on financial statements toward international integration", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfevaluating_the_knowledge_of_small_and_medium_enteprises_mana.pdf