A closed-form solution for a queueing model of energy efficient ethernet links

Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics, V.37, N.4 (2021), 453–464  
DOI 10.15625/1813-9663/37/4/16126  
A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR A QUEUEING MODEL OF  
ENERGY EFFICIENT ETHERNET LINKS  
1,∗  
2
TIEN VAN DO , CSABA ROTTER  
1Department of Networked Systems and Services,  
Budapest University of Technology and Economics  
H-1111, Magyar tud´osok k¨oru´tja 2., Budapest, Hungary  
2Nokia Bell Labs Hungary  
H-1083, B´okay J´anos utca 36 - 42, Budapest, Hungary  
Abstract. To save energy consumption of Ethernet switches, IEEE has standardized a new energy-  
efficient operation for Ethernet links with a low-power state and transition mechanisms between  
the high-power state for transporting traffic and the low-power state. In this paper, we propose a  
queueing model with the Markov Modulated Compound Poisson Process that is able to characterize  
backbone packet traffic. We derive a closed-form solution for the stationary distribution of the  
proposed queueing model. We show that our model can capture an entire system where the transition  
times are constant.  
Keywords. Energy efficient Ethernet; Queueing model; Markov modulated compound Poission  
process.  
1. INTRODUCTION  
Legacy Ethernet links are active during non-traffic periods, which could lead to the waste  
of energy [7, 14]. The IEEE 802.3az Energy Efficient Ethernet (EEE) standard specifies four  
states for the operation of green Ethernet links: Active (A), Sleep (S), Wake (W) and Low  
Power Idle (L). The energy-efficient operation for Ethernet links standardized by IEEE [6,  
5, 8, 16, 17] consists of a low-power state and transition mechanisms between the active  
state with high power consumption and the low-power state. Reviriego et al. [15] reported  
90% power save in state L where there is no traffic. IEEE, however, did not standardize  
the triggering mechanism on which conditions state L should be reached. As a result, many  
algorithms have been proposed for better L state usage, like frame transmission [16] and  
burst transmission [18] algorithm.  
Herreria-Alonso et al. [8], Reviriego et al. [16] and Ajmone Marsan et al. [1] reported  
performance evaluations using simulation models and simple analytical models (with Poisson  
Dedicated to Professor Phan Dinh Dieu on the occasion of his 85th birth anniversary.  
*Corresponding author.  
E-mail addresses: [email protected].hu  
2021 Vietnam Academy of Science & Technology  
454  
TIEN VAN DO, CSABA ROTTER  
traffic and a fixed batch packet size) for Ethernet links based on new standards. These  
models provided a qualitative comparison between algorithms and evaluated the effect of  
configuration parameters. Herreria-Alonso et al. [9] provided an analytical model for both  
frames and burst transmission algorithms. Larrabeiti et al. [11] proposed an analytical  
model to estimate the energy consumption of a two-state link and presented a performance  
comparison of cooper based versus optical Ethernet. The links’ bidirectional behaviour is  
considered in the M/G/1 model described by Chatzipapas et al. [4]. Although their model  
shows a good approximation, minor discrepancies appear when burst traffic alters from  
the Poisson assumption. An additional effective triggering mechanism to reach state L is  
considered using traffic prediction in a work by Cenedese et al. [2]. Similarly, Jiang et al. [10]  
proposed a generalized predictive control mechanism to adjust the time window parameter  
automatically. However, there are no available analytical models with stochastic processes  
(like Markov Modulated Poisson Process [13]) that can characterize IP packet traffic.  
In this paper, we propose a new model that assumes packet arrivals according to the  
Markov Modulated Compound Poisson Process, which is a generalization of the Markov  
Modulated Poisson Process – an attractive model for characterizing backbone packet traffic.  
It is worth emphasizing that only approximate Markov models are possible due to the fixed  
transition times between the modes of energy-efficient Ethernet links. Therefore, we assume  
that the transition times between the states of Ethernet links are exponentially distributed  
to obtain a tractable model. We validate our model with the exact simulation of energy-  
efficient Ethernet links. Furthermore, we derive the exact solution for the proposed analytical  
model to compare alternatives concerning the operation modes of green Ethernet links in an  
efficient way.  
The rest of this paper is organized as follows. A queueing model is proposed in Section  
2. Numerical results are shown in Section 3. Finally, Section 4 concludes our paper.  
2. A NEW ANALYTICAL MODEL  
Green Ethernet links have four states: Active (A), Sleep (S), Wake (W) and Low Power  
Idle (L). The transitions between the states for EEE 10GBASE-T links and for EEE  
100BASE-TX or 1000BASE-T links are illustrated in Figure 1 (a) and (b). Ts and Tw  
are the transition times between the modes of energy efficient Ethernet links.  
We assume that packets arrive at an Ethernet link according to the Markov Modulated  
Compound Poisson Process (MMCPP).  
The modulating Markov process has two states ON and OFF with parameters α and  
β.  
In the OFF state, there are no packet arrivals.  
In the ON state, packets arrive according to the CPP with parameters (λ, ω). Note that  
0 ≤ ω < 1. The probability distribution function of inter-arrival times τ for customers  
is defined by Pr(τ = 0) = ω and Pr(0 < τ < t) = (1 − ω)(1 − e−λt). Therefore,  
during ON state, the arrival process can be seen as batch-Poisson, with batches having  
geometric size distribution. The probability that a batch is of size s is (1 − ω)ωs−1  
.
Similarly, to [1], the size of the transmission buffer of a specific link is assumed to be infinite.  
Let J(t) be the number of packets in the system heading for the specific link (including  
the number of packet in the transmission buffer and a packet being transmitted) at time  
instant t.  
A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR A QUEUEING MODEL  
455  
No frame  
to serve  
A
S
j=2  
A
S
L
LW  
LW  
after Ts  
After Tw  
A
S
W
j=1  
j=0  
New frame  
to serve  
S
(a)  
LW  
A
(c)  
S
No frame  
to serve  
j=2  
LW  
LW  
A
S
A
S
After Tw  
New frame  
to serve  
after Ts  
j=1  
j=0  
W
L
S
New frame  
to serve  
LW  
(b)  
(d)  
Figure 1: The state transitions  
To jointly describe the state of the link and the state of the modulating process at time  
instant t, random variable I(t) is introduced. From the operation rule [6, 5] (illustrated in  
Figure 1) it is observed that the link  
is never in state L when there are packets heading for the link (i.e., when J(t) > 0),  
is never in state W when no packet is in the system (i.e., when J(t) = 0).  
Therefore, we join state L and W in our analytical model into state LW. If J(t) = 0 and  
the model is in state LW then the link is in state L. If J(t) ≥ 1 and the model is in state  
LW, then the link is in state W. We assume that the transition times between the states  
of Ethernet links are exponentially distributed to obtain a tractable model. The transition  
times from the state S to state L and the transition times from the state W to state A are  
exponentially distributed with rate νs and νW , respectively. Note that νs = Ts and νw = Tw.  
Now it is easy to identify the value set of I(t) if we lexicographically sort the states  
representing the link and the modulating process as in Table 1. The system is described by  
continuous time Markov chain (CTMC) {I(t), J(t)}. The possible transitions of the CTMC  
for EEE 10GBASE-T links when 1 ≤ I(t) ≤ 3 are illustrated in Figure 1 (c). The possible  
transitions of the CTMC for EEE 100BASE-TX or 1000BASE-T links when 1 ≤ I(t) ≤ 3  
are depicted in Figure 1 (d).  
Table 1: Values of I(t)  
I(t)  
The state of the link  
The state of the modulating Markov process  
1
A
2
S
ON  
3
LW  
4
A
5
6
LW  
S
OFF  
Let the steady state probabilities of CTMC {I(t), J(t)} be denoted by  
   
456  
TIEN VAN DO, CSABA ROTTER  
πi,j = lim Pr(I(t) = i, J(t) = j).  
t→∞  
Define the row vector vj = [π1,j, . . . , π6,j]. We have π1,0 = π4,0 = 0 due to the operation rule  
of the link.  
The infinitesimal matrix Q of CTMC {I(t), J(t)} is a block matrix (see Table 4). The  
blocks contain the transitions of the Markov chain as follows.  
(j)  
0,s  
(j)  
0,s  
(a) Block Q includes element Q (i, k) that is the s−step upward transition from state  
(i, j) to state (k, j + s) (1 ≤ i, k ≤ 6; j = 0, 1, . . .). These transitions are caused by the  
arrivals of customers.  
(b) Block Q(1j) consists of element Q(1j)(i, k) that denotes the purely phase transition from  
state (i, j) to state (k, j) (1 ≤ i, k ≤ 6, k  
̸
(c) Block Q(2j) contains element Q(2j)(i, k) that is the one−step downward transition from  
state (i, j) to state (k, j − 1) (1 ≤ i, k ≤ 6; j = 1, . . .). These transitions are caused by  
the departures of customers from the system.  
Based on the operation of the link, we can write the transition matrices and the infinitesimal  
generator matrix in Tables 2, 3 and 4. Note that matrices Q(2j), j ≥ 0, are the same for EEE  
10GBASE-T, EEE 100BASE-TX and EEE 1000BASE-T links.  
The balance equations and the normalization equation can be written as follows  
v0Q(10) + v1Q(21) = 0,  
(1)  
j−1  
X
v0Q(00,j)  
+
vj−sQ(j−s) + vjQ1 + vj+1Q2 = 0, j ≥ 1,  
0,s  
s=1  
∞
6
X X  
Theorem 1. For j > 1, the following equation holds between the stationary probabilities  
πi,j = 1.  
(2)  
(3)  
j=0 i=1  
e
e
e
vj−1Q0 + vjQ1 + vj+1Q2 = 0,  
e
e
e
where Q0 = (Q0,1 − Q1Ω), Q1 = (Q1 − Q2Ω) and Q2 = Q2.  
Proof. Let us define ωs = λ(1 − ω)ωs−1, Ω = Diag[ω, ω, ω, 0, 0, 0], Λ = Diag[λ, λ, λ, 0, 0, 0]  
Then, we obtain  
(j)  
0,s  
Q
Q
= Λ(I − Ω)Ωs−1 = Q0(j,s)−1Ω,  
(4)  
(5)  
(0)  
0,j  
(0)  
0,j−1  
= Q  
Ω.  
Multiplying balance equation concerning level j − 1, j ≥ 2, with Ω, we get  
j−2  
X
v0Q(00,j)−1Ω +  
vj−1−sQ(j−1−s)Ω = −vj−1Q1Ω − vjQ2Ω = 0, j ≥ 2.  
0,s  
s=1  
We substitute (6) into (2), and utilize equations (4) and (5). After some algebraic steps, we  
get −vj−1Q1Ω − vjQ2Ω + vj−1Q(j−1) + vjQ1 + vj+1Q2 = 0, which yields (3).  
■
0,1  
       
A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR A QUEUEING MODEL  
457  
Table 2: Transition matrices for modeling an EEE 10GBASE-T link  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(0)  
0,s  
Q
=
, s ≥ 1 ;  
0
0
ωs  
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(j)  
0,s  
Q
= Q0,s  
=
, j ≥ 1, s ≥ 1;  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
νs  
0
0
α
0
0
0
α
0
−λ − α − νs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
β
0
−λ − α  
Q(10)  
=
,
0
0
β
0
−β − νs νs  
0
−β  
−λ − α − µ  
0
0
νs  
α
0
0
0
α
0
0
0
α
0
νs  
0
νw  
β
−λ − α − νs  
0
0
β
0
−λ − α − νw  
Q(1j) = Q1 =  
,
0
0
β
−β − µ  
0
0
0
0
νw  
−β − νs  
0
−β − νw  
j ≥ 1,  
0
0
0
0
0
0
µ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
µ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q(21)  
=
,
µ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
µ
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Q(2j) = Q2 =  
, j > 1.  
 
458  
TIEN VAN DO, CSABA ROTTER  
Table 3: Transition matrices for modeling an EEE 100BASE-TX or 1000BASE-T link  
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(0)  
0,s  
Q
=
=
, s ≥ 1,  
0
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
ωs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
(j)  
0,s  
Q
= Q0,s  
, j ≥ 1, s ≥ 1,  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
νs  
0
0
α
0
0
0
α
0
−λ − α − νs  
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
β
0
−λ − α  
Q(10)  
=
,
0
0
β
0
−β − νs νs  
0
−β  
−λ − α − µ  
0
0
0
α
0
0
α
0
0
0
α
0
0
νw  
β
0
0
−α  
0
0
β
0
−λ − α − νw  
0
−β − µ  
0
Q(1j) = Q1 =  
, j ≥ 1,  
0
0
β
0
−β − νs  
νs  
νw  
0
−β − νw  
Table 4: Infinitesimal generator matrix  
(0)  
0,1  
(0)  
0,2  
(1)  
(0)  
0,j−1  
(0)  
0,j  
(0)  
0,j+1  
(1)  
0,j  
(2)  
(0)  
0,j+2  
(1)  
0,j+1  
(2)  
0,j  
(3)  
(0)  
0,j+3  
(1)  
0,j+2  
(2)  
0,j+1  
Q(10)  
Q(21)  
Q
Q
Q
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
(1)  
0,j−2  
(1)  
Q(11)  
Q(22)  
0
0,1  
0,j−1  
(2)  
0,j−3  
(2)  
0,j−2  
0
Q(12)  
Q(23)  
0,j−1  
(3)  
0,j−4  
(3)  
0,j−3  
(3)  
0,j−2  
(3)  
0,j  
0
. . .  
0,j−1  
.  
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Q =  
,
.
(j)  
0,1  
Q(1j+1)  
Q(2j+2)  
(j)  
0,2  
(j+1)  
0,1  
Q(1j+2)  
(j)  
0,3  
(j+1)  
0,2  
Q(0j+2)  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
. . .  
.
.
.
Q(2j)  
Q(1j)  
Q(2j+1)  
. . .  
Q
Q
Q
. . .  
. . .  
Q
Q
. . .  
. . .  
.
.
.
. . .  
.
.
.
. . .  
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
   
A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR A QUEUEING MODEL  
459  
The consequence of Theorem 1 is that vj, j ≥ 1, is the solution of quadratic matrix  
equation (3) as  
6
X
vj  
=
bkψkxj−1 (j ≥ 1);  
(6)  
k
k=1  
where  
bk are suitable coefficients to be determined using balance equation (1), balance equa-  
tion (2) for j = 1, and the normalization equation,  
e
e
(xk, ψk), k = 1, . . . , 6 are the left eigenvalue-eigenvector pairs of Q(x) = Q0 + Q1x +  
2
e
Q2x inside the unit circle (see [3]). Let ψk = [ψk,1, ψk,2, ψk,3, ψk,4, ψk,5, ψk,6]. Note  
that the left eigenvalue-eigenvector pairs satisfy ψkQ(xk) = 0 and det[Q(xk)] = 0, k =  
1, . . . , 6.  
Remarks. One may observe that equation (3) looks like the balance equation of homoge-  
neous quasi-birth-death processes [12]. Therefore, one may express vj as the function of the  
so-called rate matrix R ( see [12] for the matrix geometric solution). However, some proper-  
e
e
e
ties (e.g., the non-negative elements) of the rate matrix do not hold because Q0 + Q1 + Q2  
is not a stochastic matrix.  
1
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
1
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
ω
ω
(a)  
(b)  
1
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
ω
(c)  
Figure 2: Probability vs ω for ρ = 0.1  
2.1. The left-eigenvalues for an EEE 10GBASE-T link model  
Utilizing Theorem 1, we obtain  
2
3
e
e
e
det[Q(x)] = det[Q0 + Q1x + Q2x ] = (x − 1)x f1(x)f2(x)f3(x),  
 
460  
TIEN VAN DO, CSABA ROTTER  
1
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
1
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
ω
ω
(a)  
(b)  
1
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
ω
(c)  
Figure 3: Probability vs ω for ρ = 0.2  
where  
f1(x) = µ2x2 − (αµ + βµ + λµ + µ2 + µ2ω)x + βλ + λµ + αµω + βµω + µ2ω,  
f2(x) = (βλ + ανs + βνs + λνs + νs2)x − βλ − λνs − ανsω − βνsω − νs2ω,  
f3(x) = (βλ + ανw + βνw + λνw + νw2 )x − βλ − λνw − ανwω − βνwω − νw2 ω.  
As a consequence, det[Q(x)] has 8 roots. The roots inside the unit circle are  
x1 = x2 = x3 = 0,  
βλ + λνs + ανsω + βνsω + νs2ω  
x4  
x5  
x6  
=
=
=
,
βλ + ανs + βνs + λνs + νs2  
βλ + λνw + ανwω + βνwω + νw2 ω  
βλ + ανw + βνw + λνw + νw2  
αµ + βµ + λµ + µ2 + µ2ω  
,
2µ2  
p
(αµ + βµ + λµ + µ2 + µ2ω)2 − 4µ2(βλ + λµ + αµω + βµω + µ2ω)  
2µ2  
−
.
 
A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR A QUEUEING MODEL  
461  
2.2. The left-eigenvalues for an EEE 100BASE-TX or 1000BASE-T link model  
In this case, det[Q(x)] can be expressed as follows  
det[Q(x)] = ανs(x − 1)x3(x − ω)f4(x)f5(x),  
where  
f4(x) = x(βλ + ανw + βνw + λνw + νw2 ) − βλ − λνw − ανwω − βνwω − νw2 ω,  
f5(x) = βλ + λµ + αµω + βµω + µ2ω − x(αµ + βµ + λµ + µ2 + µ2ω) + µ2x2.  
Thus, the roots inside the unit circle are  
x1 = x2 = x3 = 0,  
x4 = ω,  
βλ + λνw + ανwω + βνwω + νw2 ω  
βλ + ανw + βνw + λνw + νw2  
αµ + βµ + λµ + µ2 + µ2ω  
x5  
x6  
=
=
,
2µ2  
p
(αµ + βµ + λµ + µ2 + µ2ω)2 − 4µ2(βλ + λµ + αµω + βµω + µ2ω)  
2µ2  
−
.
The corresponding eigenvectors of zero-eigenvalues are [0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0], [0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0],  
[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1]. Using ψkQ(xk) = 0, we can easily determine the exact formula of ψk for  
non zero eigenvalues. Then, the expressions for v0 and bk, k = 1, . . . , 6, can be derived as  
well (we do not write here because the long formulae).  
2.3. Performance measures  
The probability of state A, S, L and W can be determined as  
6
3
X
X
bk(ψk,1 + ψk,4  
1 − xk  
)
)
PA = π1,0 + π4,0  
+
+
+
+
bk(ψk,1 + ψk,4),  
bk(ψk,2 + ψk,5),  
k=4  
k=1  
6
3
X
X
bk(ψk,2 + ψk,5  
1 − xk  
PS = π2,0 + π5,0  
PL = π3,0 + π6,0  
k=4  
k=1  
,
PW = 1 − PA − PS − PL.  
3. NUMERICAL RESULTS  
To show that the queueing model can evaluate the performance of Energy Efficient Eth-  
ernet links, we compare results obtained by a simulation where transition times Tw and Ts  
between states are fixed. Note that in the proposed queueing model, the transition times  
follow the exponential distribution. Simulations are performed with a confidence level of  
99%. For Ts = 2.88, Tw = 4.16 µs (see [16]), α = 0.0001695 (the average ON period is 5.899  
462  
TIEN VAN DO, CSABA ROTTER  
ms), β = 0.000110 (the average OFF period is 9.09 ms), the average packet size is of 1500  
rON  
λ
bytes (hence µ = 0.833 1/µs in 10Gbits links), ρ = (1−ω)µ , we plot the probabilities obtained  
with our model and the simulation model in Figures 2, 3 and 4. We can conclude that the  
agreement between the simulation and analytical results is excellent.  
1
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
0.001  
0.0001  
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
ω
ω
(a)  
(b)  
0.001  
0.0001  
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
ω
(c)  
Figure 4: Probability vs ω for ρ = 0.5  
From Figure 5, when the load is small, the higher is ω is, the better energy saving can be  
achieved. At the same load (the same amount of packets), the burstiness (packets in batches  
of more packets) would have a better impact on energy saving.  
For an EEE 1000BASE-T link model, we plot the probability in state L versus Tw and  
Ts in Figure 6. From the curve, it seems that Tw has a minimal impact on PL.  
4. CONCLUSIONS  
We have proposed a queueing model for Energy Efficient Ethernet links. In the model  
packets arrive according to the Markov Modulated Compound Poisson Process and the  
transition times between the states of Ethernet links are exponentially distributed. We have  
derived the exact solution for the steady-state probabilities of the analytical model. The  
comparison between our model and the simulation of energy-efficient Ethernet links shows  
that the proposed model can capture the behaviour of Energy Efficient Ethernet links.  
 
A CLOSED-FORM SOLUTION FOR A QUEUEING MODEL  
463  
1
ρ=0.1  
ρ=0.2  
ρ=0.3  
ρ=0.4  
ρ=0.5  
ρ=0.6  
ρ=0.7  
ρ=0.8  
ρ=0.9  
0.8  
0.6  
0.4  
0.2  
0
0
0.2  
0.4  
0.6  
0.8  
1
ω
Figure 5: Probability in state L  
0.5  
0.48  
0.46  
0.44  
0.42  
0.4  
PrL  
0.38  
0.36  
20  
18  
16  
14  
12  
0
10  
20  
40  
8
Tw  
60  
80  
6
100  
4
120  
140  
2
160  
Ts  
180  
0
200  
Figure 6: Probability in state L vs Ts and Tw, 1000BASE-T links  
REFERENCES  
[1] M. Ajmone Marsan, A. Anta, V. Mancuso, B. Rengarajan, P. Vasallo, and G. Rizzo, “A simple  
analytical model for energy efficient Ethernet,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 15, no. 7,  
pp. 773 –775, July 2011.  
[2] A. Cenedese, F. Tramarin, and S. Vitturi, “An energy efficient Ethernet strategy based on  
traffic prediction and shaping,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, pp. 1–1, 2016. [Online].  
P
K
[3] R. Chakka and T. V. Do, “The MM k=1 CPPk/GE/c/L G-Queue with Heterogeneous Servers:  
Steady state solution and an application to performance evaluation,” Performance Evaluation,  
vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 191–209, March 2007.  
[4] A. Chatzipapas and V. Mancuso, “An M/G/1 model for gigabit energy efficient  
Ethernet links with coalescing and real-trace-based evaluation,” IEEE/ACM Transactions  
on Networking, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 2663–2675, Oct. 2016. [Online]. Available: https:  
           
464  
TIEN VAN DO, CSABA ROTTER  
[5] K. Christensen, P. Reviriego, B. Nordman, M. Bennett, M. Mostowfi, and J. Maestro, “IEEE  
802.3az: the road to energy efficient Ethernet,” Communications Magazine, IEEE, vol. 48, no. 11,  
pp. 50 –56, November 2010.  
[6] K. Christensen, P. Reviriego, B. Nordman, M. Bennett, M. Mostowfi, and J. A. Maestro, “Ieee  
802.3az: the road to energy efficient Ethernet,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 48, no. 11,  
pp. 50–56, 2010.  
[7] M. Gupta, S. Grover, and S. Singh, “A feasibility study for power management in LAN switches,”  
in Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols, 2004. ICNP  
2004., 2004, pp. 361–371.  
[8] S. Herreria-Alonso, M. Rodriguez-Perez, M. Fernandez-Veiga, and C. Lopez-Garcia, “A power  
saving model for burst transmission in energy-efficient Ethernet,” Communications Letters,  
IEEE, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 584 –586, May 2011.  
[9] ——, “A GI/G/1 Model for 10 Gb/s Energy Efficient Ethernet Links,” IEEE Transactions  
on Communications, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 3386–3395, Nov. 2012. [Online]. Available:  
[10] W. Jiang, J. Wang, L. Peng, and J. Wang, “Generalized predictive control of the time window  
for energy efficient Ethernet with prediction,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 25, no. 5,  
pp. 1491–1495, May 2021. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/lcomm.2021.3051626  
[11] D. Larrabeiti, P. Reviriego, J. Hern´andez, J. Maestro, and M. Uruen˜a, “Towards an  
energy efficient 10 Gb/s optical Ethernet: Performance analysis and viability,” Optical  
Switching and Networking, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 131–138, Jul. 2011. [Online]. Available:  
[12] G. Latouche and V. Ramaswami, Introduction to Matrix Analytic Methods in Stochastic Model-  
ing. ASA-SIAM Series on Statistics and Applied Probability, 1999.  
[13] L. Muscariello, M. Mellia, M. Meo, M. A. Marsan, and R. L. Cigno, “Markov models of internet  
traffic and a new hierarchical MMPP model,” Computer Communications, vol. 28, no. 16, pp.  
1835–1851, 2005.  
[14] B. Nordman, “Eee savings estimate,” IEEE 802.03az Task Force Information”,year =2008.  
[15] P. Reviriego, K. Christensen, J. Rabanillo, and J. A. Maestro, “An initial evaluation of energy  
efficient Ethernet,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 578–580, 2011.  
[16] P. Reviriego, J. Hernandez, D. Larrabeiti, and J. Maestro, “Performance evaluation of energy  
efficient Ethernet,” Communications Letters, IEEE, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 697 –699, Sept. 2009.  
[17] P. Reviriego, J. Maestro, J. Hern´andndez, and D. Larrabeiti, “Burst transmission for energy-  
efficient Ethernet,” Internet Computing, IEEE, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 50 –57, july-aug. 2010.  
[18] M. Rodriguez-Perez, S. Herreria-Alonso, M. Fernandez-Veiga, and C. Lopez-Garcia, “Improved  
opportunistic sleeping algorithms for lan switches,” in GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global  
Telecommunications Conference, 2009, pp. 1–6.  
Received on June 7, 2021  
Accepted on August 21, 2021  
                           
pdf 12 trang Thùy Anh 16060 Free
Bạn đang xem tài liệu "A closed-form solution for a queueing model of energy efficient ethernet links", để tải tài liệu gốc về máy hãy click vào nút Download ở trên

File đính kèm:

  • pdfa_closed_form_solution_for_a_queueing_model_of_energy_effici.pdf